| TOSS: an extension of TAX with ontologies and similarity queries |
| Full text |
Pdf
(401 KB)
|
| Source
|
International Conference on Management of Data
archive
Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data
table of contents
Paris, France
SESSION: Research sessions: schema discovery
table of contents
Pages: 719 - 730
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-859-8
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsor |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4, Downloads (12 Months): 35, Citation Count: 5
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
TAX is perhaps the best known extension of the relational algebra to handle queries to XML databases. One problem with TAX (as with many existing relational DBMSs) is that the semantics of terms in a TAX DB are not taken into account when answering queries. Thus, even though TAX answers queries with 100% precision, the recall of TAX is relatively low. Our TOSS system improves the recall of TAX via the concept of a similarity enhanced ontology (SEO). Intuitively, an ontology is a set of graphs describing relationships (such as isa, partof, etc.) between terms in a DB. An SEO also evaluates how similarities between terms (e.g. "J. Ullman", "Jeff Ullman", and "Jeffrey Ullman") affect ontologies. Finally, we show how the algebra proposed in TAX can be extended to take SEOs into account. The result is a system that provides a much higher answer quality than TAX does alone (quality is defined as the square root of the product of precision and recall). We experimentally evaluate the TOSS system on the DBLP and SIGMOD bibliographic databases and show that TOSS has acceptable performance.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
P. Bonatti, Y. Deng, and V. S. Subrahmanian. An ontology-extended relational algebra. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration (IEEE IRI 2003), 2003.
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
D. Calvanese, G. D. Giacomo, and M. Lenzerini. A framework for ontology integration. In Proc. of the First Semantic Web Working Symposium, pages 303--316, 2001.
|
| |
5
|
W. W. Cohen, P. Ravikumar, and S. E. Fienberg. A comparison of string metrics for matching names and records. In Proc. of the First Workshop on Data Cleaning, Record Linkage, and Object Consolidation, 2003.
|
| |
6
|
DBLP XML records. Available at http://dblp.uni-trier.de/xml/, Nov 2003.
|
| |
7
|
G. A. Miller et. al. WordNet - a lexical database for english. Cognitive Science Laboratory, Princeton University. Available at http://www.cogsci.princeton.edu/~wn/w3wn.html, 2000.
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
M. A. Jaro. Probabilistic linkage of large public health data files. Statistics in Medicine, 14:491--498, 1995.
|
| |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
A. Monge and C. Elkan. The field-matching problem: algorithm and applications. In Proc. of the Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1996.
|
| |
13
|
SIGMOD Record in XML. Available at http://www.acm.org/sigmod/record/xml/, Nov 2002.
|
| |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
|
 |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
G. Wiederhold. Interoperation, mediation and ontologies. In International Symp. on Fifth Generation Computer Systems, Workshop on Heterogeneous Cooperative Knowledge Bases, ICOT, pages 33--48, 1994.
|
| |
18
|
Apache Xindice XML database. Available at http://xml.apache.org/xindice/.
|
|