ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The price of validity in dynamic networks
Full text PdfPdf (255 KB)
Source International Conference on Management of Data archive
Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data table of contents
Paris, France
SESSION: Research sessions: P2P and sensor networks table of contents
Pages: 515 - 526  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-859-8
Authors
Mayank Bawa  Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Aristides Gionis  Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Hector Garcia-Molina  Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Rajeev Motwani  Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Sponsor
SIGMOD: ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 41,   Citation Count: 16
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1007568.1007627
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Massive-scale self-administered networks like Peer-to-Peer and Sensor Networks have data distributed across thousands of participant hosts. These networks are highly dynamic with short-lived hosts being the norm rather than an exception. In recent years, researchers have investigated best-effort algorithms to efficiently process aggregate queries (e.g., sum, count, average, minimum and maximum) [6, 13, 21, 34, 35, 37] on these networks. Unfortunately, query semantics for best-effort algorithms are ill-defined, making it hard to reason about guarantees associated with the result returned. In this paper, we specify a correctness condition, single-site validity, with respect to which the above algorithms are best-effort. We present a class of algorithms that guarantee validity in dynamic networks. Experiments on real-life and synthetic network topologies validate performance of our algorithms, revealing the hitherto unknown price of validity.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
R. Albert, H. Jeong, and A.-L Barabasi. Diameter of the world wide web. Nature, 401, 1999.
3
 
4
A.-L Barabasi and R. Albert. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286, 1999.
 
5
 
6
 
7
D. De Couto, D. Aguayo, B. Chambers, and R. Morris. Performance of multihop wireless networks: Shortest path is not enough. In Proc. of HotNets, 2002.
8
 
9
The dss clip2 company.
10
11
 
12
P. Flajolet and G. N. Martin. Probabilistic counting. In Proc. of FOCS, 1983.
 
13
14
 
15
16
17
 
18
 
19
20
21
22
 
23
S. Milgram. The small world problem. Psychology Today, 1, 1967.
 
24
D. L. Mills. Network time protocol (version 2) specification and implementation, 1989.
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
K. H. Pollock, J. D. Nichols, C. Brownie, and J. E. Hines. Statistical inference for capture-recapture experiments. Wildlife Society Monographs, 107, 1990.
29
 
30
 
31
 
32
S. Saroiu, P. Gummadi, and S. Gribble. A measurement study of peer-to-peer file sharing systems. In Proc. of MMCN, 2002.
33
34
 
35
Y. Yao and J. Gehrke. Query processing for sensor networks. In Proc. of CIDR, 2003.
 
36
Z. Zhang, S. Shi, and J. Zhu. SOMO: Self-organized metadata overlay for resource management in p2p dht. In Proc. of IPTPS, 2003.
 
37
J. Zhao, R. Govindan, and D. Estrin. Computing aggregates for monitoring wireless sensor networks. In Proc. of SNPA, 2003.

CITED BY  16
Collaborative Colleagues:
Mayank Bawa: colleagues
Aristides Gionis: colleagues
Hector Garcia-Molina: colleagues
Rajeev Motwani: colleagues