ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Lower bounds for linear degeneracy testing
Full text PdfPdf (207 KB)
Source
Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the thirty-sixth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
Chicago, IL, USA
SESSION: Session 15A table of contents
Pages: 554 - 560  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-852-0
Authors
Nir Ailon  Princeton University, Princeton, NJ
Bernard Chazelle  Princeton University, Princeton, NJ
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 22,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1007352.1007436
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In the late nineties Erickson proved a remarkable lower bound on the decision tree complexity of one of the central problems of computational geometry: given n numbers, do any r of them add up to 0? His lower bound of Ω(nr/2⌉), for any fixed r, is optimal if the polynomials at the nodes are linear and at most r-variate. We generalize his bound to s-variate polynomials for s>>r. Erickson's bound decays quickly as r grows and never reaches above pseudo-polynomial: we provide an exponential improvement. Our arguments are based on three ideas: (i) a geometrization of Erickson's proof technique; (ii) the use of error-correcting codes; and (iii) a tensor product construction for permutation matrices.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Arkin, E. M., Chiang, Y. -J., Held, M., Mitchell, J. S. B., Sacristan, V., Skiena, S. S., Yang, T. -C. On minimum-area hulls, Algorithmica 21 (1998), 119--136.
 
2
Barequet, G., Har-Peled, S. Polygon containment and translational min-Hausdorff-distance between segment sets are 3SUM-hard, Int. J. Comput. Geom. and App. 11 (2001), 465--474.
 
3
4
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
Dobkin, D. P., Lipton, R. J. On the complexity of computations under varying set of primitives, Journal of Computer and Systems Science 18 (1979), 86--91.
 
10
Erickson J. Lower bounds for linear satisfiability problems, Chicago Journal of Theoretical Computer Science 8, 1999.
 
11
 
12
Erickson J., Seidel, R. Better lower bounds on detecting affine and spherical degeneracies, Disc. Comput. Geom. 13 (1995) 41--57.
 
13
Fredman, M. L. How good is the information theory bound in sorting, Theoret. Comput. Sci. 1 (1976), 355--361.
 
14
15
 
16
Grigoriev, D., Karpinski, M., Vorobjov, N. Lower bound on testing membership to a polyhedron by algebraic decision and computation trees, Discrete Comput. Geom. 17 (1997), 191--215.
 
17
MacWillams, F. J., Sloane, N. J. A. The Theory of Error Correcting Codes, North Holland, 1977.
 
18
Matousek, J. On geometric optimization with few violated constraints, Disc. Comput. Geom. 14 (1995), 365--384.
19
 
20
Nagura, J. On the interval containing at least one prime number, Proc. Japan Acad. 28 (1952), 177--181.
 
21
Steele, M., Yao, A. C. Lower bounds for algebraic decision trees, Journal of Algorithms 3 (1982), 1--8.
 
22
 
23
 
24
Yao, A. C. DIMACS Workshop on Intrinsic Complexity of Computation, April 10--13, 2000.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Nir Ailon: colleagues
Bernard Chazelle: colleagues