ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Better extractors for better codes?
Full text PdfPdf (217 KB)
Source
Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the thirty-sixth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
Chicago, IL, USA
SESSION: Session 11B table of contents
Pages: 436 - 444  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-852-0
Author
Venkatesan Guruswami  University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 29,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1007352.1007422
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We present an explicit construction of codes that can be list decoded from a fraction (1-ε) of errors in sub-exponential time and which have rate ε/logO(1)(1/ε). This comes close to the optimal rate of Ω(ε), and is the first sub-exponential complexity construction to beat the rate of ε2 achieved by Reed-Solomon or algebraic-geometric codes. Our construction is based on recent extractor constructions with very good seed length [17]. While the "standard" way of viewing extractors as codes (as in [16]) cannot beat the O(ε2) rate barrier due to the 2 log (1/ε) lower bound on seed length for extractors, we use such extractor codes as a component in a well-known expander-based construction scheme to get our result. The O(ε2) rate barrier also arises if one argues about list decoding using the minimum distance (via the so-called Johnson bound) --- so this also gives the first explicit construction that "beats the Johnson bound" for list decoding from errors.The main message from our work is perhaps conceptual, namely that good strong extractors for low min-entropies will yield near-optimal list decodable codes. Given all the progress that has been made on extractors, we view this as an optimistic avenue to look for better list decodable codes, both by looking for better explicit extractor constructions, as well as by importing non-trivial techniques from the extractor world in reasoning about and constructing codes.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Noga Alon, Jehoshua Bruck, Joseph Naor, Moni Naor, and Ronny Roth. Construction of asymptotically good low-rate error-correcting codes through pseudo-random graphs. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 38:509--516, 1992.
 
2
 
3
 
4
Venkatesan Guruswami, Johan Hastad, Madhu Sudan, and David Zuckerman. Combinatorial Bounds for List Decoding. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 48(5):1021--1035, May 2002.
 
5
6
 
7
Venkatesan Guruswami and Madhu Sudan. Improved decoding of Reed-Solomon and algebraic-geometric codes. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 45:1757--1767, 1999.
8
 
9
 
10
Ronen Shaltiel. Recent Developments in Explicit Constructions of Extractors. Bulletin of the EATCS, 77:67--95, 2002.
 
11
 
12
13
 
14
 
15
16
 
17
18
 
19


Collaborative Colleagues:
Venkatesan Guruswami: colleagues