ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Sublinear algorithms for testing monotone and unimodal distributions
Full text PdfPdf (254 KB)
Source
Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the thirty-sixth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
Chicago, IL, USA
SESSION: Session 10B table of contents
Pages: 381 - 390  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-852-0
Authors
Tugkan Batu  University of Texas, Austin, TX
Ravi Kumar  IBM Almaden Research Center, San Jose, CA
Ronitt Rubinfeld  M. I. T., Cambridge, MA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 33,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1007352.1007414
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The complexity of testing properties of monotone and unimodal distributions, when given access only to samples of the distribution, is investigated. Two kinds of sublinear-time algorithms---those for testing monotonicity and those that take advantage of monotonicity---are provided. The first algorithm tests if a given distribution on [n] is monotone or far away from any monotone distribution in L1-norm; this algorithm uses O(√n) samples and is shown to be nearly optimal. The next algorithm, given a joint distribution on [n] x [n], tests if it is monotone or is far away from any monotone distribution in L1-norm; this algorithm uses O(n3/2) samples. The problems of testing if two monotone distributions are close in L1-norm and if two random variables with a monotone joint distribution are close to being independent in L1-norm are also considered. Algorithms for these problems that use only poly(log n) samples are presented. The closeness and independence testing algorithms for monotone distributions are significantly more efficient than the corresponding algorithms as well as the lower bounds for arbitrary distributions. Some of the above results are also extended to unimodal distributions.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
8
 
9
O. Goldreich and D. Ron. On testing expansion in bounded degree graphs. Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity, TR00-020, 2000.
 
10
O. Goldreich, S. Goldwasser, E. Lehman, D. Ron, and A. Samorodnitsky. Testing monotonicity. Combinatorica, 20(3):301--337, 2000.
 
11


Collaborative Colleagues:
Tugkan Batu: colleagues
Ravi Kumar: colleagues
Ronitt Rubinfeld: colleagues