ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Graph entropy and quantum sorting problems
Full text PdfPdf (137 KB)
Source
Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the thirty-sixth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
Chicago, IL, USA
SESSION: Session 4A table of contents
Pages: 112 - 117  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-852-0
Author
Andrew Chi-Chih Yao  Princeton University, Princeton, NJ
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12,   Downloads (12 Months): 61,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1007352.1007377
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Let P = (X, < P) be a partial order on a set of n elements X = x1, x2,..., xn. Define the quantum sorting problem QSORTP as: given n distinct numbers x1, x2,..., xn consistent with P, sort them by a quantum decision tree using comparisons of the form "xi: xj". Let Qε(P) be the minimum number of queries used by any quantum decision tree for solving QSORTP with error less than ε (where 0 < ε < 1/10 is fixed). It was proved by Hoyer, Neerbek and Shi (Algorithmica 34 (2002), 429--448) that, when P0 is the empty partial order, Qε(P0) ≥ Ω (n log n), i. e., the classical information lower bound holds for quantum decision trees when the input permutations are unrestricted.In this paper we show that the classical information lower bound holds, up to an additive linear term, for quantum decision trees for any partial order P. Precisely, we prove Qε(P) ≥ c log2 e(P)-c'n where c,c' > 0 are constants and e(P) is the number of linear orderings consistent with P. Our proof builds on an interesting connection between sorting and Korner's graph entropy that was first noted and developed by Kahn and Kim (JCSS 51(1995), 390--399).


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
C. Csiszar, J. Korner, L. Lovasz, K. Marton, and G. Simonyi. Entropy splitting for antiblocking corners and perfect graphs. Combinatorica, 10:27--40, 1990.
 
8
E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, S. Gutmann, and M. Sipser. A limit on the speed of quantum computation for insertion into an ordered list. arXiv. org e-Print archive, quant-ph/9812057, 1998.
 
9
M. Fredman. How good is the information bound in sorting. Theoretical Computer Science, 1:355--361, 1976.
 
10
P. Hoyer, J. Neerbek, and Y. Shi. Quantum complexities of ordered searching, sorting, and element distinctness. Algorithmica, 34:429--448, 2002.
 
11
 
12
J. Kahn and N. Linial. Balancing poset extensions via Brunn-Minkowski. Combinatorica, 11:363--368, 1991.
 
13
J. Kahn and M. Saks. Balancing poset extensions. Order, 1:113--126, 1984.
 
14
J. Korner. Coding of an information source having ambiguous alphabet and the entropy of graphs. In Transactions of 6th Prague Conference on Information Theory, etc., pages 411--425. Academia, Prague, 1973.
 
15
 
16
I. Newman, P. Ragde, and A. Wigderson. Perfect hashing, graph entropy and circuit complexity. In Proc. 5th Annual IEEE Symposium on Structure in Complexity Theory, pages 91--100. IEEE, 1990.
 
17
 
18
Y. Shi. Entropy lower bounds of quantum decision tree complexity. Information Processing Letters, 81(1):23--27, 2002.
 
19
 
20
G. Simonyi. Perfect graphs and graph entropy: An updated survey. Chapter 13 in Perfect Graphs, edited by J. Ramirez-Alfonsin and B. Reed, pages 293--328. John Wiley and Sons, 2001.
 
21

Collaborative Colleagues:
Andrew Chi-Chih Yao: colleagues