ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Inter-reference gap distribution replacement: an improved replacement algorithm for set-associative caches
Full text PdfPdf (427 KB)
Source
International Conference on Supercomputing archive
Proceedings of the 18th annual international conference on Supercomputing table of contents
Malo, France
SESSION: Cache table of contents
Pages: 20 - 30  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-839-3
Authors
Masamichi Takagi  University of Tokyo
Kei Hiraki  University of Tokyo
Sponsors
SIGARCH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Architecture
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 33,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1006209.1006213
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We propose a novel replacement algorithm, called Inter-Reference Gap Distribution Replacement (IGDR), for set-associative secondary caches of processors. IGDR attaches a weight to each memory-block, and on a replacement request it selects the memory-block with the smallest weight for eviction. The time difference between successive references of a memory-block is called its Inter-Reference Gap (IRG). IGDR estimates the ideal weight of a memory-block by using the reciprocal of its IRG.To estimate this reciprocal, it is assumed that each memory-block has its own probability distribution of IRGs; from which IGDR calculates the expected value of the reciprocal of the IRG to use as the weight of the memory-block. For implementation, IGDR does not have the probability distribution; instead it records the IRG distribution statistics at run-time. IGDR classifies memory-blocks and records statistics for each class. It is shown that the IRG distributions of memory-blocks correlate their reference counts, this enables classifying memory-blocks by their reference counts. IGDR is evaluated through an execution-driven simulation. For ten of the SPEC CPU2000 programs, IGDR achieves up to 46.1% (on average 19.8%) miss reduction and up to 48.9% (on average 12.9%) speedup, over the LRU algorithm.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
L. A. Belady. A study of replacement algorithms for virtual storage computers. IBM Sys. J., 5(2):78--101, 1966.
3
 
4
5
 
6
7
 
8
J. M. Kim, J. Choi, J. Kim, S. H. Noh, S. L. Min, Y. Cho, and C. S. Kim. A low-overhead, high-performance unified buffer management scheme that exploits sequential and looping references. In Proc. the 4th USENIX Symp. on Operating System Design and Implementation, pages 119--134, Oct. 2000.
 
9
 
10
11
12
13
 
14
J. Schauer. Opensource floating point adder, May 2002. http://www.hmc.edu/chips.
 
15
G. S. Shedler and C. Tung. Locality in page reference strings. SIAM J. on Computing, 1:218--241, Sept. 1972.
 
16
P. Shivakumar and N. Jouppi. Cacti 3.0: an integrated cache timing, power, and area model. Technical Report 2001/2, Compaq WRL, Aug. 2001.
 
17
M. Takagi. Improving Cache Performance by Exploiting Redundancy, Temporal Affinity, and Reuse of Data. PhD thesis, Univ. of Tokyo, Dec. 2003.
 
18
M. Uya, K. Kaneko, and J. Yasui. A cmos floating point multiplier. IEEE J. of Solid-Sate Circuits, 19(5):697--702, Oct. 1984.
19
 
20


Collaborative Colleagues:
Masamichi Takagi: colleagues
Kei Hiraki: colleagues