ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Connectivity restrictions in overlay multicast
Full text PdfPdf (119 KB)
Source International Workshop on Network and Operating System Support for Digital Audio and Video archive
Proceedings of the 14th international workshop on Network and operating systems support for digital audio and video table of contents
Cork, Ireland
SESSION: Overlay networking table of contents
Pages: 54 - 59  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-801-6
Authors
Aditya Ganjam  Carnegie Mellon University
Hui Zhang  Carnegie Mellon University
Sponsors
SIGMULTIMEDIA: ACM Special Interest Group on Multimedia
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 32,   Citation Count: 7
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1005847.1005860
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A large number of overlay multicast protocols have been developed, almost all of which assume universal connectivity between end hosts. However, in reality, this assumption is not valid with widespread use of Network Address Translators (NAT) and firewalls. The impact of NAT and firewall connectivity restrictions on overlay multicast, especially in the application-endpoint setting, has not been seriously considered. In this paper, we argue that it is critical to consider connectivity restrictions because NAT and firewall hosts make up a large fraction of the endpoints, affecting proper functionality as well as performance of overlay multicast protocols. We present several design enhancements that explicitly consider connectivity restrictions in overlay multicast and evaluate the design space and tradeoffs based on real Internet broadcasts and Internet testbed experiments.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Understanding Universal Plug and Play. Microsoft White Paper.
 
2
Akamai. http://www.akamai.com/.
3
4
 
5
 
6
Y. Chu, A. Ganjam, T.S. Eugene Ng, S.G. Rao, K. Sripanidkulchai, J. Zhan, and H. Zhang. Early Experience with an Internet Broadcast System Based on Overlay Multiast. To Appear In Proceedings of USENIX Annual Technical Conference, Boston, MA, June 2004.
7
8
 
9
P. Francis. Yoid: Your Own Internet Distribution, http://www.aciri.org/yoid/. April 2000.
 
10
J. Rosenberg, J. Weinberger, C. Huitema and R. Mahy. STUN - Simple Traversal of UDP Through Network Address Translators. RFC 3489, March 2003.
 
11
J. Jannotti, D. Gifford, K. L. Johnson, M. F. Kaashoek, and J. W. O'Toole Jr. Overcast: Reliable Multicasting with an Overlay Network. In Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium on Operating System Design and Implementation (OSDI), San Diego, CA, October 2000.
 
12
J. Liebeherr and M. Nahas. Application-layer Multicast with Delaunay Triangulations. In IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference Globecom, San Antonio, TX, November 2001.
 
13
A.M. Kermarrec M. Castro, P. Druschel and A. Rowstron. Scribe: A large-scale and decentralized application-level multicast infrastructure. In IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications Vol. 20 No. 8, Oct 2002.
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
Slashdot. http://slashdot.org/.
18
 
19
 
20
W. Wang, D. Helder, S. Jamin, and L. Zhang. Overlay optimizations for end-host multicast. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Networked Group Communication (NGC), October 2002.
21

CITED BY  8

Collaborative Colleagues:
Aditya Ganjam: colleagues
Hui Zhang: colleagues