ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Algorithms for polynomial GCD computation over algebraic function fields
Full text PdfPdf (186 KB)
Source International Conference on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation archive
Proceedings of the 2004 international symposium on Symbolic and algebraic computation table of contents
Santander, Spain
Pages: 297 - 304  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-827-X
Authors
Mark van Hoeij  Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL
Michael Monagan  Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C. Canada
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGSAM: ACM Special Interest Group on Symbolic and Algebraic Manipulation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 32,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1005285.1005328
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Let L be an algebraic function field in k ≥ 0 parameters t;1;, ..., t;k;. Let f;1;, f;2; be non-zero polynomials in L[x]. We give two algorithms for computing their gcd. The first, a modular GCD algorithm, is an extension of the modular GCD algorithm of Brown for Z[x;1;,...,x;n;] and Encarnacion for Q(α)[x] to function fields. It is uses rational number and rational function reconstruction and trial division. The second, a fraction-free algorithm, is a modification of the Moreno Maza and Rioboo algorithm for computing gcds over triangular sets. The modification reduces coefficient growth in L to be linear. We show how to extend the modular GCD algorithm to work when the minimal polynomial for L is not irreducible. We give an empirical comparison of the two algorithms using implementations in Maple.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
3
 
4
J. J. Cannon (2003). Magma Handbook, http://magma.maths.usyd.edu.au/magma/htmlhelp/MAGMA.htm
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
The GNU Multiple Precision Arithmetic Library. Copyright, Free Software Foundation, Inc. (2002). http://www.gnu.org/software/gmp/gmp.html
 
9
E. Hecke (1981). Lectures on the Theory of Algebraic Numbers, Springer Graduate Texts in Mathematics 77.
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
Maple 8 Introductory Programming Guide M. B. Monagan, K. O. Geddes, K. M. Heal, G. Labahn, S. M. Vorkoetter, J. McCarron, P. DeMarco. Waterloo Maple, 2002. ISBN: 1-894511-27-1.
 
18
19
 
20
21
 
22
A. Steel (2003). Private communication.
 
23
D. Stoutemyer (1984). Which Polynomial Representation is Best? Proceedings of the 1984 Macsyma User's Conference.
24
25
26
 
27


Collaborative Colleagues:
Mark van Hoeij: colleagues
Michael Monagan: colleagues