ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Improvements to a triangulation-decomposition algorithm for ordinary differential systems in higher degree cases
Full text PdfPdf (297 KB)
Source International Conference on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation archive
Proceedings of the 2004 international symposium on Symbolic and algebraic computation table of contents
Santander, Spain
Pages: 191 - 198  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-827-X
Author
Evelyne Hubert  INRIA, Sophia Antipolis, France
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGSAM: ACM Special Interest Group on Symbolic and Algebraic Manipulation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 24,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1005285.1005314
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We introduce new ideas to improve the efficiency and rationality of a triangulation decomposition algorithm. On the one hand we identify and isolate the polynomial remainder sequences in the triangulation-decomposition algorithm. Subresultant polynomial remainder sequences are then used to compute them and their specialization properties are applied for the splittings. The gain is two fold: control of expression swell and reduction of the number of splittings. On the other hand, we remove the role that initials had in previous triangulation-decomposition algorithms. They are not needed in theoretical results and it was expected that they need not appear in the input and output of the algorithms. This is the case of the algorithm presented. New algorithms are presented to compute a subsequent characteristic decomposition from the output of the triangulation decomposition algorithm where the initials need not appear.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
P. Aubry. Ensembles triangulaires de polynômes et rsolution de systémes algèbriques. Implantation en Axiom. PhD thesis, Universit7eacute; de Paris 6, 1999.
 
2
 
3
F. Boulier and E. Hubert. textscdiffalg: description and examples of use. U. of Waterloo, 1998, \www.inria.fr/cafe/Evelyne.Hubert/diffalg.
4
 
5
F. Boulier, D. Lazard, F. Ollivier, and M. Petitot. Computing representations for radicals of finitely generated differential ideals. Technical Report IT-306, LIFL, 1997.
6
7
 
8
 
9
G. Carra Ferro. Grübner bases and differential algebra. In AAECC, volume 356 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer-Verlag, 1987.
 
10
S-C. Chou and X-S. Gao. Automated reasonning in differential geometry and mechanics using the characteristic set method. Part II. Mechanical theorem proving. Journal of Automated Reasonning, 10:173--189, 1993.
 
11
12
 
13
S. Dellière. Triangularisation de systèmes constructibles. Application à l'évaluation dynamique. PhD thesis, Univ. de Limoges, 1999.
 
14
L. Ducos. Optimizations of the subresultant algorithm. Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, 145(2):149--163, 2000.
 
15
M. Fliess and S.T. Glad. An algebraic approach to linear and nonlinear control. In Essays on control: Perspectives in the theory and its applications, volume 14. Birkhäuser, Boston, 1993.
 
16
T. Gómez-Dîaz. Applications de l'évaluation dynamique. PhD thesis, Univ. de Limoges, 1994.
 
17
 
18
E. Hubert. Notes on triangular sets and triangulation-decomposition algorithms I: Polynomial systems. In Winkler and Langer.
 
19
E. Hubert. Notes on triangular sets and triangulation-decomposition algorithms II: Differential systems. In Winkler and Langer.
20
 
21
 
22
A. A. Kapaev and E. Hubert. A note on the Lax pairs for Painlevé equations. Journal of Physics. A. Mathematical and General, 32(46), 1999.
 
23
E. R. Kolchin. Differential Algebra and Algebraic Groups, volume 54 of Pure and Applied Mathematics. Academic Press, 1973.
 
24
Francois Lemaire. Les classements les plus généraux assurant l'analycité des solutions des systèmes orthonomes pour des conditions initiales analytiques. In CASC 2002. Technische Universität München, Germany, 2002.
 
25
 
26
E. L. Mansfield. Differential Gröbner Bases. PhD thesis, University of Sydney, 1991.
 
27
E. L. Mansfield, G. J. Reid, and P. A. Clarkson. Nonclassical reductions of a 3+1-cubic nonlinear Schrödinger system. Computer Physics Communications, 115:460--488, 1998.
 
28
G. Margaria, E. Riccomagno, M. J. Chappell, and H. P. Wynn. Differential algebra methods for the study of the structural identifiability of rational function state-space models in the biosciences. Mathematical Biosciences, 174(1):1--26, 2001.
 
29
 
30
M. Moreno-Maza. Calculs de pgcd au-dessus des tours d'extensions simples et résolution des systèmes d'équations algébriques. PhD thesis, Université Paris 6, 1997.
 
31
 
32
F. Ollivier and A. Sedoglavic. Algorithmes efficacxes pour tester l'identifiabilité locale. In Conférence Internationale Francophone d'Automatique. IEEE, 2002.
 
33
C. Riquier. Les systèmes d'équations aux dérivées partielles. Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1910.
 
34
J. F. Ritt. Differential Algebra, volume XXXIII of Colloquium publications. American Mathematical Society, 1950. \tt http://www.ams.org/online\_bks.
 
35
36
 
37
A. Seidenberg. An elimination theory for differential algebra. University of California Publications in Mathematics, 3(2):31--66, 1956.
 
38
D. Wang. An elimination method for differential polynomial systems. I. Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, 9(3):216--228, 1996.
 
39
 
40
 
41
F. Winkler and U. Langer, editors. Symbolic and Numerical Scientific Computing, volume 2630 of LNCS. Springer Verlag, 2003.
 
42
W. T. Wu. On the foundation of algebraic differential geometry. Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, 2(4):289--312, 1989.