ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A practical approach to error recovery for multiagent planning systems
Full text PdfPdf (782 KB)
Source ACM Annual Computer Science Conference archive
Proceedings of the 1990 ACM annual conference on Cooperation table of contents
Washington, D.C., United States
Pages: 201 - 207  
Year of Publication: 1990
ISBN:0-89791-348-5
Authors
Hyugoo Han  Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL
Kai-Hsiung Chang  Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 9,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/100348.100379
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A practical approach to error recovery strategy for real-time multiagent environments is presented. In a dynamic domain, when things do not happen as a pre-generated plan has expected, parts of the plan should be recovered to cope with any unexpected situations rather than abandoning the original plan and replanning from scratch. In order to deal with such situations, domain heuristics are used to order and classify conditions, and a resource management scheme is developed. Two tables, Wedge Table and Action Table, are introduced for prompt location of the contaminated plan parts. Plan rationale and wedge structure of a plan tree are recorded in these two tables. In order to solve the truth maintenance problem, action dependency calculation is established. This error recovery approach for multiagent planning environments not only promises successful achievement of a goal but also secures the safety of facilities in a domain. It enhances system performance and flexibility due to the versatility in real-time plan execution.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Chang, K. H. and Edhala, M., "Execution Error ecovery for Planning Systems", IEEE Trans. on Systems, Men, and Cybernetics, Vol. 19, No. 1, 1989 pp. 130-134
 
2
Cheeseman, P,., 'A Reoresent, ation of Time for Automatic Planning , Proe. IEEE, Intl Conf. on Robotics, Atlanta, GA, Mar., 1984
 
3
Fikes, R. E. and Nilsson, hi. J., "STRIPS: A New pproach to the ApNication of Theorem Proving to Problem Sorving", Artificiar'intelligence, Vol. 2, 1971, pp. 189-208
 
4
Fikes, R. E., Hart, P. E., and Nilsson, N.J., "Learning and Executing Generalized Robot Plans, Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 3, 1972, pp 251-288
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
Lansk~,, A. L., "A Representation of Parallel A/~tivity based on Events, Structure, and Causali~, Reasoning about Actions & Plans: Proc of 1986 Workshop Timberline, OR, June, 1986,pp. 123-159 , Editted by (;eorgeff, M. and Lansky, A., Mdrgan Kaufm,,~ Pub. Inc., Los Altos, CA
 
9
 
10
Sacerdoti, E. D., 'A Structure for Plans and Behavior, Elsevier, North-HoUand New York, NY 1977
 
11
 
12
Tate, A., "Generating t'rolect Networks, IICAI-77, Cambridge, MA, Aug.,197"F, pp. 888-893
 
13
Wi}kins, D. E., "Recovering from Execution Errors in SIPE, Computational Intelligence, Vol. 1, 1985, pp. 33-45


Collaborative Colleagues:
Hyugoo Han: colleagues
Kai-Hsiung Chang: colleagues