ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Semantics modeling issues for processing natural language database queries
Full text PdfPdf (884 KB)
Source ACM Annual Computer Science Conference archive
Proceedings of the 1990 ACM annual conference on Cooperation table of contents
Washington, D.C., United States
Pages: 8 - 14  
Year of Publication: 1990
ISBN:0-89791-348-5
Author
D. G. Shin  Computer Science and Engineering Dept., University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 21,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/100348.100350
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This work explores data semantics issues necessary for designing an NL interface capable of dealing with incomplete NL queries. First, the notion of incomplete NL queries is clarified to conclude the necessity for enriching the data semantics component of the system. An assumption made by the existing NL interfaces is expounded to argue that the approaches based on this assumption are unable to explore meta-knowledge about the stored data in the query conversion process. A new, unconventional approach is proposed whose tenets underlie the separation between the conceptual interpretation of NL queries and the semantics descriptions of the database constituents. This approach allows explicit descriptions of the conceptual knowledge, referred to herein as epistemological specifications, on the DB constituents.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
INTELLECT Query System U~er'a Guide. AI Corp., Newton Center, MA., second edition, 1980.
2
 
3
4
 
5
R.J. Brachman and J. G. Schmolze. An overview of the KL-ONE knowledge representation system. Cognitive Science, 9:171-216, 1985.
 
6
 
7
C. L. Chang. Finding missing joina .for incom. plete queriea in relational databaseL Technical Report RJ2145, IBM Research Lab, San Jose, CA, 1978.
8
 
9
E. F. Codd. How About Recently? In B. Shneiderman, editor, Databasea: Improving usability and resporuivenesa, Academic Press~ New York, 1978.
10
 
11
C. J. Fillmore. The Case for Case. In E. Bach and R. T. Harms, editors, UniverJala in Linguistic Theory, pages 1-88, Holt, Rinerhart, and Winston, Inc., New York, 1968.
 
12
 
13
 
14
C. D. Hafner and K. S. Godden. Design of natural Inn. guage interfaces: a case study. Technical Report GMR- 4567, GM Res. Lab., Warren, Michigan, Jan. 1984.
15
 
16
L. Harris. User Oriented Data Base Query with the ROBOT Natural Language Query System. In Proc. o} VLDB, pages 303-311, 1977.
17
 
18
 
19
H. Ishikawa et al. Designing a knowledge-based natural language interface. IEEE Expert, 2(2):57-71, 1987.
 
20
 
21
 
22
23
 
24
J. J. Katz and J. A. Fordor. The Structure of a Semantic Theory. In Language, pages 170-210, 1963.
 
25
C. Kellogg. From Data Management to Knowledge Management. Computer, 19(1 ):75-84, 1986.
 
26
 
27
P. Martin, D. Appelt, and F. Pereira. Transportability and Generality in a Natural-Language Interface System. In Proc. of 8th IJCA!, pages 573-581, 1983.
28
 
29
 
30
31
32
33
 
34
W. J. Plath. REQUEST: A natural language question-answering system. IBM J. ReJ. Development, 20(4):326-335, July 1976.
 
35
36
37
 
38
39
40
41
42