|
ABSTRACT
It is possible to design cooperative work tools based only on “common sense” and good intuitions. But the history of technology is replete with examples of good theories greatly aiding the development of useful technology. Where, then, might we look for theories to help us design computer-supported cooperative work tools? In this paper, we will describe one possible perspective—the interdisciplinary study of coordination—that focuses, in part, on how people work together now and how they might do so differently with new information technologies.
In one sense, there is little that is new about the study of coordination. Many different disciplines—including computer science, sociology, political science, management science, systems theory, economics, linguistics, and psychology—have all dealt, in one way or another, with fundamental questions about coordination. Furthermore, several previous writers have suggested that theories about coordination are likely to be important for designing cooperative work tools (e.g., [Holt88], [Wino86]).
We hope to suggest here, however, that the potential for fruitful interdisciplinary connections concerning coordination is much greater than has as yet been widely appreciated. For instance, we believe that fundamentally similar coordination phenomena arise—unrecognized as such—in many of the fields listed above. Though a single coherent body of theory about coordination does not yet exist, many different disciplines could both contribute to and benefit from more general theories of coordination. Of particular interest to researchers in the field of computer-supported cooperative work is the prospect of drawing on a much richer body of existing and future work in these fields than has previously been suggested.
In this paper, we will first describe what we mean by “coordination theory” and give examples of how previous research on computer-supported cooperative work can be interpreted from this perspective. We will then suggest one way of developing this perspective further by proposing tentative definitions of coordination and analyzing its components in more detail.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
Amer81
|
American Heritage Dictionary. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1981.
|
| |
Bali86
|
|
| |
Bali81
|
Baligh, H. H., Burton, R. M. Describing and designing organizational structures and processes. International Journal of Policy Analysis and Information Systems, 5, 251-266, 1981.
|
| |
Barn64
|
Barnard, C. I. The Functions of the Executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 1964.
|
| |
Beer67
|
Beer, S. Cybernetics and Management (2nd ed.). London: English Universities Press, 1967.
|
| |
Boul56
|
Boulding, K.E. The Image. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, 1956.
|
| |
Cibo87
|
Ciborra, C. U. Reframing the role of computers in organizations: The transaction costs approach. Office Technology and People, 3, 17-38, 1987.
|
 |
Conk88
|
|
| |
Crow90
|
Crowston, K. Modeling Coordination in Organizations. Ph.D. Dissertation, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Forthcoming (1990).
|
| |
Curt89
|
Curtis, B. Modeling coordination from field experiments. In Organizational Computing, Coordination and Collaboration: Theories and Technologies for Computer-Supported Work. Austin, TX, 1989.
|
| |
Debr59
|
Debreu, G. Theory of value" An axiomatic analysis of economic equilibrium. New York: Wiley, 1959.
|
| |
Emer69
|
Emery, j. C. Organizational Planning and Control Systems: Theory and Technology. New York: MacMillan, 1969.
|
 |
Erma80
|
|
 |
Flor88
|
|
| |
Forr80
|
Forrester, J. W. Systems dynamics. New York: North-Holland, 1980.
|
| |
Fox81
|
Fox, M. S. An organizational view of distributed systems. I EEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 11(1), 70-79, 1981.
|
| |
Galb73
|
|
| |
Gard85
|
|
 |
Hart90
|
|
 |
Hewi86
|
|
| |
Holt89
|
Holt, A. Personal communication., 1989.
|
 |
Holt88
|
|
| |
Hube88
|
|
| |
Korn81
|
Kornfeld, W. A., Hewitt, C. The scientific community metaphor. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-11, 24-33, 1981.
|
 |
Lai88
|
|
| |
Lawr67
|
Lawrence, P. R. & Lorsch, J.W. Organization and Environment. Boston: Graduate School of Business Adminsitration, Harvard University, 1967.
|
| |
Lee90a
|
|
 |
Lee90b
|
|
| |
Malo87a
|
|
| |
Malo87b
|
|
| |
Malo88a
|
Malone, T. W. What is coordination theory? (Working paper #2051-88). Cambridge, MA: MIT Sloan School of Management, 1988.
|
| |
Malo90
|
|
 |
Malo87c
|
|
| |
Malo88b
|
|
| |
McGr84
|
McGrath, J.E. Groups: Interaction and Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1984.
|
| |
Mill88
|
Miller, M. S., Drexler, K.E. Markets and computation: Agoric open systems. In Huborman, B. A. (Ed.), The Ecology of Computation (pp. 133- 176). Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1988.
|
| |
Mins87
|
Minsky, M. The Society of the Mind. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1987.
|
| |
Mint79
|
Mintzberg, H. The Structuring of Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1979.
|
| |
Nii86
|
|
| |
Norm80
|
Norman, D. A. Twelve issues for cognitive science. Cognitive Science, 4, 1-32, 1980.
|
| |
NSF89
|
NSF-IRIS. A report by the NSF-IRIS Review Panel for Research on Coordination Theory and Technology. Available from NSF Forms & Publications Unit, 1989.
|
| |
Pfef78
|
Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G. R. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependency Perspective. New York: Harper & Row, 1978.
|
| |
Sche60
|
Schelling, T. C. Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1960.
|
| |
Sear75
|
Searle, J. R. A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In Gunderson, K. (Ed.), Language, Mind and Knowledge (pp. 344--369). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, 1975.
|
| |
Rock89
|
Rockart, J. F. & Short, J. E. IT and the networked organization: Toward more effective management of interdependence. In M. S. Scott Morton (Ed.), Management in the 1990s Research Program Final Report. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1989.
|
| |
Smit81
|
Smith, R. G., Davis, R. Frameworks for cooperation in distributed problem solving. 1EEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 11(1), 61- 70, 1981.
|
| |
Such87
|
|
| |
Thom67
|
Thompson, J. D. Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
|
| |
Turo83
|
Turoff, M. Information, value, and the internal marketplace (Unpublished manuscript). New Jersey Institute of Technology, 1983.
|
| |
vonB50
|
yon Bertalanffy, L. The theory of open systems in physics and biology. Science, 111, 1950.
|
| |
Wien61
|
|
| |
Will85
|
WiUiamson, O. The Economic Institutions of Capitah'sm. New York: Free Press, i985.
|
| |
Wino87
|
Winograd, T. A language/action perspective on the design of cooperative work. Human Computer Interaction, 3, 3-30, 1987.
|
| |
Wino86
|
|
CITED BY 51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wolfgang Prinz , Gloria Mark , Uta Pankoke-Babatz, Designing groupware for congruency in use, Proceedings of the 1998 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, p.373-382, November 14-18, 1998, Seattle, Washington, United States
|
|
Weigang Wang , Jörg M. Haake, Flexible coordination with cooperative hypertext, Proceedings of the ninth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia : links, objects, time and space---structure in hypermedia systems: links, objects, time and space---structure in hypermedia systems, p.245-255, June 20-24, 1998, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
|
|
Roy T. Fielding , E. James Whitehead, Jr. , Kenneth M. Anderson , Gregory A. Bolcer , Peyman Oreizy , Richard N. Taylor, Web-based development of complex information products, Communications of the ACM, v.41 n.8, p.84-92, Aug. 1998
|
|
Catherine G. Wolf , John Karat, Capturing what is needed in multi-user system design: observations from the design of three healthcare systems, Proceedings of the conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, p.405-415, August 18-20, 1997, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
|
|
Marcel Hoffmann , Kai-Uwe Loser , Thomas Walter , Thomas Herrmann, A design process for embedding knowledge management in everyday work, Proceedings of the international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work, p.296-305, November 14-17, 1999, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
|
|
Tuomo Tuikka, Searching requirements for a system to support cooperative concept design in product development, Proceedings of the conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, p.395-403, August 18-20, 1997, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patricia M. Jones, Cooperative support for distributed supervisory control: requirements, issues, and an example from mission operations, Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, p.239-242, January 04-07, 1993, Orlando, Florida, United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas Herrmann , Marcel Hoffmann , Isa Jahnke , Andrea Kienle , Gabriele Kunau , Kai-Uwe Loser , Natalja Menold, Concepts for usable patterns of groupware applications, Proceedings of the 2003 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work, November 09-12, 2003, Sanibel Island, Florida, USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. P. Shim , Merrill Warkentin , James F. Courtney , Daniel J. Power , Ramesh Sharda , Christer Carlsson, Past, present, and future of decision support technology, Decision Support Systems, v.33 n.2, p.111-126, June 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|