ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
What is coordination theory and how can it help design cooperative work systems?
Full text PdfPdf (1.12 MB)
Source Computer Supported Cooperative Work archive
Proceedings of the 1990 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work table of contents
Los Angeles, California, United States
Pages: 357 - 370  
Year of Publication: 1990
ISBN:0-89791-402-3
Authors
Thomas W. Malone  Center for Coordination Science (E53-333), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
Kevin Crowston  Center for Coordination Science (E53-333), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
SIGGROUP: ACM Special Interest Group on Supporting Group Work
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 36,   Downloads (12 Months): 365,   Citation Count: 51
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/99332.99367
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

It is possible to design cooperative work tools based only on “common sense” and good intuitions. But the history of technology is replete with examples of good theories greatly aiding the development of useful technology. Where, then, might we look for theories to help us design computer-supported cooperative work tools? In this paper, we will describe one possible perspective—the interdisciplinary study of coordination—that focuses, in part, on how people work together now and how they might do so differently with new information technologies. In one sense, there is little that is new about the study of coordination. Many different disciplines—including computer science, sociology, political science, management science, systems theory, economics, linguistics, and psychology—have all dealt, in one way or another, with fundamental questions about coordination. Furthermore, several previous writers have suggested that theories about coordination are likely to be important for designing cooperative work tools (e.g., [Holt88], [Wino86]). We hope to suggest here, however, that the potential for fruitful interdisciplinary connections concerning coordination is much greater than has as yet been widely appreciated. For instance, we believe that fundamentally similar coordination phenomena arise—unrecognized as such—in many of the fields listed above. Though a single coherent body of theory about coordination does not yet exist, many different disciplines could both contribute to and benefit from more general theories of coordination. Of particular interest to researchers in the field of computer-supported cooperative work is the prospect of drawing on a much richer body of existing and future work in these fields than has previously been suggested. In this paper, we will first describe what we mean by “coordination theory” and give examples of how previous research on computer-supported cooperative work can be interpreted from this perspective. We will then suggest one way of developing this perspective further by proposing tentative definitions of coordination and analyzing its components in more detail.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
Amer81
American Heritage Dictionary. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1981.
 
Bali86
 
Bali81
Baligh, H. H., Burton, R. M. Describing and designing organizational structures and processes. International Journal of Policy Analysis and Information Systems, 5, 251-266, 1981.
 
Barn64
Barnard, C. I. The Functions of the Executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 1964.
 
Beer67
Beer, S. Cybernetics and Management (2nd ed.). London: English Universities Press, 1967.
 
Boul56
Boulding, K.E. The Image. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, 1956.
 
Cibo87
Ciborra, C. U. Reframing the role of computers in organizations: The transaction costs approach. Office Technology and People, 3, 17-38, 1987.
Conk88
 
Crow90
Crowston, K. Modeling Coordination in Organizations. Ph.D. Dissertation, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Forthcoming (1990).
 
Curt89
Curtis, B. Modeling coordination from field experiments. In Organizational Computing, Coordination and Collaboration: Theories and Technologies for Computer-Supported Work. Austin, TX, 1989.
 
Debr59
Debreu, G. Theory of value" An axiomatic analysis of economic equilibrium. New York: Wiley, 1959.
 
Emer69
Emery, j. C. Organizational Planning and Control Systems: Theory and Technology. New York: MacMillan, 1969.
Erma80
Flor88
 
Forr80
Forrester, J. W. Systems dynamics. New York: North-Holland, 1980.
 
Fox81
Fox, M. S. An organizational view of distributed systems. I EEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 11(1), 70-79, 1981.
 
Galb73
 
Gard85
Hart90
Hewi86
 
Holt89
Holt, A. Personal communication., 1989.
Holt88
 
Hube88
 
Korn81
Kornfeld, W. A., Hewitt, C. The scientific community metaphor. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-11, 24-33, 1981.
Lai88
 
Lawr67
Lawrence, P. R. & Lorsch, J.W. Organization and Environment. Boston: Graduate School of Business Adminsitration, Harvard University, 1967.
 
Lee90a
Lee90b
 
Malo87a
 
Malo87b
 
Malo88a
Malone, T. W. What is coordination theory? (Working paper #2051-88). Cambridge, MA: MIT Sloan School of Management, 1988.
 
Malo90
Malo87c
 
Malo88b
 
McGr84
McGrath, J.E. Groups: Interaction and Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1984.
 
Mill88
Miller, M. S., Drexler, K.E. Markets and computation: Agoric open systems. In Huborman, B. A. (Ed.), The Ecology of Computation (pp. 133- 176). Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1988.
 
Mins87
Minsky, M. The Society of the Mind. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1987.
 
Mint79
Mintzberg, H. The Structuring of Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1979.
 
Nii86
 
Norm80
Norman, D. A. Twelve issues for cognitive science. Cognitive Science, 4, 1-32, 1980.
 
NSF89
NSF-IRIS. A report by the NSF-IRIS Review Panel for Research on Coordination Theory and Technology. Available from NSF Forms & Publications Unit, 1989.
 
Pfef78
Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G. R. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependency Perspective. New York: Harper & Row, 1978.
 
Sche60
Schelling, T. C. Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1960.
 
Sear75
Searle, J. R. A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In Gunderson, K. (Ed.), Language, Mind and Knowledge (pp. 344--369). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, 1975.
 
Rock89
Rockart, J. F. & Short, J. E. IT and the networked organization: Toward more effective management of interdependence. In M. S. Scott Morton (Ed.), Management in the 1990s Research Program Final Report. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1989.
 
Smit81
Smith, R. G., Davis, R. Frameworks for cooperation in distributed problem solving. 1EEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 11(1), 61- 70, 1981.
 
Such87
 
Thom67
Thompson, J. D. Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
 
Turo83
Turoff, M. Information, value, and the internal marketplace (Unpublished manuscript). New Jersey Institute of Technology, 1983.
 
vonB50
yon Bertalanffy, L. The theory of open systems in physics and biology. Science, 111, 1950.
 
Wien61
 
Will85
WiUiamson, O. The Economic Institutions of Capitah'sm. New York: Free Press, i985.
 
Wino87
Winograd, T. A language/action perspective on the design of cooperative work. Human Computer Interaction, 3, 3-30, 1987.
 
Wino86

CITED BY  51
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Collaborative Colleagues:
Thomas W. Malone: colleagues
Kevin Crowston: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: