ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Collaborative technology and group process feedback: their impact on interactive sequences in meetings
Full text PdfPdf (1.11 MB)
Source Computer Supported Cooperative Work archive
Proceedings of the 1990 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work table of contents
Los Angeles, California, United States
Pages: 53 - 64  
Year of Publication: 1990
ISBN:0-89791-402-3
Authors
Marcial Losada  EDS Center for Machine Intelligence, 2001 Commonwealth Blvd, Ann Arbor, MI
Pedro Sanchez  EDS Center for Machine Intelligence, 2001 Commonwealth Blvd, Ann Arbor, MI
Elizabeth E. Noble  EDS Center for Machine Intelligence, 2001 Commonwealth Blvd, Ann Arbor, MI
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
SIGGROUP: ACM Special Interest Group on Supporting Group Work
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 61,   Citation Count: 13
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/99332.99341
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We analyzed group collaborative behavior by detecting patterns of interactive sequences in meetings using time series analysis. This is in contrast to previous work in which frequency counts of interactions were analyzed. Researchers have reported a decrease of these interaction frequencies associated with the use of computer-supported collaborative technology [Appl86, McGu87, Sieg86, Wats88]. We found that if group process feedback is given to people participating in a computer-supported collaborative technology meeting, the number of socio-emotional interactive sequences increases significantly above the expected level determined by log-linear analysis. In contrast, when using collaborative computer technology alone (no feedback), there is a substantial reduction in the number of socio-emotional interactive sequences below the expected level. These findings have implications for the efficient use of computer technology in terms of maximizing its collaborative potential.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

Appl86
 
Bake86
Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. Observing Interaction: An Introduction to Sequential Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
 
Bale79
Bales, R. F., & Cohen, S. P. SYMLOG: A System for the Multiple Level Observation of Groups. New York, NY: Free Press, 1979.
 
Box76
 
Brow88
Brown, R. Group Processes: Dynamics Within and Between Groups. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell, 1988.
 
Carv81
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. Attention and Self-Regulation: A Control-Theory Approach to Human Behavior. New York, NY: Springer- Verlag, 1981.
 
Chat89
Chatfield, C. The Analysis of Time Series: An Introduction (4th ed.). London & New York: Chapman and Hall, 1989.
 
Cook88
Cook, P. G., Ellis, C. A., & Rein, G. L. Meetings research - A Nick retrospective. (Tech. Rep. # STP-048-88). Austin, TX: MCC, 1988.
 
Dabb87
Dabbs, J. M., & Ruback, B.R. Dimensions of group process: Amount and structure of vocal interaction. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 123-169, 1987.
 
Davi89
David, F. R., Pearce, J. A., & Randolph, W. A. Linking technology and structure to enhance group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74,233-241, 1989.
 
Duma86
Dumas, J.E. Controlling for autocorrelation in social interaction analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 125-127, 1986.
Elwa90
 
Gott79
Gottman, J. M. Detecting cyclicity in social interaction. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 338-348, 1979.
 
Gott80
Gottman, J. M. Analyzing for sequential connection and assessing interobserver reliability for the sequential analysis of observational data. Behavioral Assessment, 2, 361-368, 1980.
 
Gott81a
Gottman, J. M. Time Series Analysis: A Comprehensive Introduction for Social Scientists. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
 
Gott81b
Gottman, J. M., & Ringland, T. J. The analysis of dominance and bidirectionality in social development. Child Development, 52, 393-412, 1981.
 
Gott82
Gottman, J. M., Rose, F., & Mettetal, G. Time-series analysis of social interaction data. In T. Field, & A. Fogel (Eds.), Emotion and Early Interactions (pp. 261-289). HiUsdale, NJ" Lawrence Earlbaum, 1982.
 
Gott90
Gottman, J. M., & Roy, A. K. Sequential Analysis: A Guide for Behavioral Researchers. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
 
Hack75
Hackman, J. R., & Morris, C. G. Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. In L. Berkowitz (lEd.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York, NY: Academic Press, 1975.
 
Hack78
Hackman, J. R., & Morris, C. G. Group process and group effectiveness: a reappraisal. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.) Group Processes. New York: Academic .Press, 1978.
 
Hack90
Hackman, J. R. (Ed.) Groups That Work and Those That Don't. San Francisco, CA: Joyce-Bass, 1990.
 
Jone89
Jones, M. R., & Boltz, M. Dynamic attending and responses to time. Psychological Review, 96, 459-491, 1989.
 
Kies88
 
Klap85
Klapp, S. T., Hill, M., Tyler, J., Martin, Z., Jagacinski, R., & Jones, M. R. On marching to two different drummers: Perceptual aspects of the difficulties. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11,814-827, 1985.
 
Lamb79
Lamb, M. E., Suomi, S. J., & Stephenson, G. R. (Eds.). Social Interaction Analysis: Methodological Issues. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1979.
 
Losa90
Losada, M., & Markovitch, S. GroupAnalyzer: A system for dynamic analysis of group interaction. Proceedings of the 23rd. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Vol. IV: Emerging Technologies, 101- 110, 1990.
Mant88
 
McGr84
McGrath, J. E. Groups: Interaction and Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ" Prentice-Hall, 1984.
 
McGu87
McGuire, T. W., Kiesler, S., & Siegel, J. Group and computer-mediated discussion effects in risk decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 917-930, 1987.
 
Newt87
Newtson, D., Hairfield, J., Bloomingdale, J., & Cutino, S. The structure of action and interaction. Social Cognition, 5, 191-237, 1987.
 
Reve82
Revenstorf, D., Kunert, H., Hahlweg, K., & Schindler, L. The use of cross-correlational and other time-series parameters in clinical analysis. In O. D. Anderson (Ed.), Time Series Analysis: Theory and Practice 1. New York, NY: North-Holland Publishing Company, 1982.
 
Shaw76
Shaw, M. E. Group Dynamics. (2nd edn.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1976.
 
Sieg86
Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., & McGuire, T. W. Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 157-187, 1986.
 
Stei86
Steiner, I. D. Paradigms and groups. In L. Berkowitz 0Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 251-289). Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 1986.
 
Wats88
 
Wiem88
Wiemann, J. M., & Giles, H. Interpersonal communication. In M. Hewstone, W. Stroebe, J. P. Godol, & G. M. Stephenson (Eds.), Introduction to Social Psychology: A European Perspective (pp. 199-221). Oxford, England and New York, NY: Basil Blackwell, 1988.

CITED BY  13
 
 
 
 
 

Collaborative Colleagues:
Marcial Losada: colleagues
Pedro Sanchez: colleagues
Elizabeth E. Noble: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: