ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Scalable and lightweight key distribution for secure group communications
Full text PdfPdf (157 KB)
Source International Journal of Network Management archive
Volume 14 ,  Issue 3  (May 2004) table of contents
Pages: 167 - 176  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISSN:1099-1190
Authors
Fu-Yuan Lee  Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering at National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan 300, China
Shiuhpyng Shieh  Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering of National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan 300, China
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 0,   Downloads (12 Months): 14,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: 10.1002/nem.515

ABSTRACT

Securing group communications in dynamic and large-scale groups is more complex than securing one-to-one communications due to the inherent scalability issue of group key management. In particular, cost for key establishment and key renewing is usually relevant to the group size and subsequently becomes a performance bottleneck in achieving scalability. To address this problem, this paper proposes a new approach that features decoupling of group size and computation cost for group key management. By using a hierarchical key distribution architecture and load sharing, the load of key management can be shared by a cluster of third parties without revealing group messages to them. The proposed scheme provides better scalability because the cost for key management of each component is independent of the group size. Specifically, our scheme incurs constant computation and communication overheads for key renewing. In this paper, we present the detailed design of the proposed scheme and performance comparisons with other schemes. Briefly, our scheme provides better scalability than existing group key distribution approaches.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
2. Deering S. Host Extensions for IP Multicasting, Aug. 1989; RFC-1112.
 
3
3. Fenner W. Internet Group Management Protocol, Version 2, Nov. 1997; RFC-2236.
 
4
4. Waitzman D, Partridge C, Deering S. Distance Vector Multicast Routing Protocol, Nov. 1988; RFC-1075.
 
5
5. Estrin D, Farinacci D, Helmy A, Thaler D, Deering S, Handley M, Jacobson V, Liu C, Sharma P, Wei L. Protocol Independent Multicast-Sparse Mode (PIMSM): Protocol Specification, Jun. 1998; RFC-2362.
 
6
6. Ballardie A. Core Based Trees (CBT) Multicast Routing Architecture, Sep. 1997; RFC-2201.
 
7
7. Ballardie A. Core Based Trees (CBT version 2) Multicast Routing--Protocol Specification, Sep. 1997; RFC-2189.
8
 
9
9. Moy J. Multicast Extensions to OSPF, Mar. 1994; RFC-1584.
 
10
10. Bagnall P, Briscoe R, Poppitt A. Taxonomy of Communication Requirements for Large-scale Multicasting Applications, Dec. 1999; RFC-2729.
 
11
11. Wallner D, Harder E, Agee R. Key Management for Multicast: Issues and Architectures, Jun. 1999; RFC-2627.
 
12
12. Moyer MJ, Rao JR, Rohatgi P. A Survey of Security Issues in Multicast Communications, IEEE Network, Nov./Dec. 1999; 13: 12-23.
 
13
 
14
14. Waldvogel M, Caronni G, Sun D, Weiler N, Plattner B. The VersaKey framework: versatile group key management, IEEE Journal Select. Areas Communication , Sep. 1999; 17: 1614-1631.
 
15
 
16
16. Wong CK, Lam SS. Keystone: A Group Key Management Service, in International Conference. Telecommunications, 2000.
 
17
18
19
 
20
21
 
22
 
23
24


Collaborative Colleagues:
Fu-Yuan Lee: colleagues
Shiuhpyng Shieh: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: