|
ABSTRACT
Securing group communications in dynamic and large-scale groups is more complex than securing one-to-one communications due to the inherent scalability issue of group key management. In particular, cost for key establishment and key renewing is usually relevant to the group size and subsequently becomes a performance bottleneck in achieving scalability. To address this problem, this paper proposes a new approach that features decoupling of group size and computation cost for group key management. By using a hierarchical key distribution architecture and load sharing, the load of key management can be shared by a cluster of third parties without revealing group messages to them. The proposed scheme provides better scalability because the cost for key management of each component is independent of the group size. Specifically, our scheme incurs constant computation and communication overheads for key renewing. In this paper, we present the detailed design of the proposed scheme and performance comparisons with other schemes. Briefly, our scheme provides better scalability than existing group key distribution approaches.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
2. Deering S. Host Extensions for IP Multicasting, Aug. 1989; RFC-1112.
|
| |
3
|
3. Fenner W. Internet Group Management Protocol, Version 2, Nov. 1997; RFC-2236.
|
| |
4
|
4. Waitzman D, Partridge C, Deering S. Distance Vector Multicast Routing Protocol, Nov. 1988; RFC-1075.
|
| |
5
|
5. Estrin D, Farinacci D, Helmy A, Thaler D, Deering S, Handley M, Jacobson V, Liu C, Sharma P, Wei L. Protocol Independent Multicast-Sparse Mode (PIMSM): Protocol Specification, Jun. 1998; RFC-2362.
|
| |
6
|
6. Ballardie A. Core Based Trees (CBT) Multicast Routing Architecture, Sep. 1997; RFC-2201.
|
| |
7
|
7. Ballardie A. Core Based Trees (CBT version 2) Multicast Routing--Protocol Specification, Sep. 1997; RFC-2189.
|
 |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
9. Moy J. Multicast Extensions to OSPF, Mar. 1994; RFC-1584.
|
| |
10
|
10. Bagnall P, Briscoe R, Poppitt A. Taxonomy of Communication Requirements for Large-scale Multicasting Applications, Dec. 1999; RFC-2729.
|
| |
11
|
11. Wallner D, Harder E, Agee R. Key Management for Multicast: Issues and Architectures, Jun. 1999; RFC-2627.
|
| |
12
|
12. Moyer MJ, Rao JR, Rohatgi P. A Survey of Security Issues in Multicast Communications, IEEE Network, Nov./Dec. 1999; 13: 12-23.
|
| |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
14. Waldvogel M, Caronni G, Sun D, Weiler N, Plattner B. The VersaKey framework: versatile group key management, IEEE Journal Select. Areas Communication , Sep. 1999; 17: 1614-1631.
|
| |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
16. Wong CK, Lam SS. Keystone: A Group Key Management Service, in International Conference. Telecommunications, 2000.
|
| |
17
|
|
 |
18
|
Xiaozhou Steve Li , Yang Richard Yang , Mohamed G. Gouda , Simon S. Lam, Batch rekeying for secure group communications, Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web, p.525-534, May 01-05, 2001, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
[doi> 10.1145/371920.372153]
|
 |
19
|
Suvo Mittra, Iolus: a framework for scalable secure multicasting, Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM '97 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communication, p.277-288, September 14-18, 1997, Cannes, France
|
| |
20
|
|
 |
21
|
|
| |
22
|
|
| |
23
|
|
 |
24
|
|
|