ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Active resource management for the differentiated services environment
Full text PdfPdf (217 KB)
Source International Journal of Network Management archive
Volume 14 ,  Issue 3  (May 2004) table of contents
Pages: 149 - 165  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISSN:1099-1190
Authors
Manish Mahajan  Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Rutgers University
Ananthanarayanan Ramanathan  Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Rutgers University
Manish Parashar  Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 94 Brett Road, Piscataway, NJ
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 0,   Downloads (12 Months): 18,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: 10.1002/nem.514

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a mechanism for active resource management (ARM) in a differentiated services environment. While the differentiated services architecture and the bandwidth broker agent provide a mechanism for QoS management through resource reservation, this mechanism is based on a static provisioning of resources. As bandwidth requirement are typically dynamic, such a static reservation approach can either lead to wasted bandwidth or leave applications resource-starved. The active resource management approach presented in this paper addresses this problem by dynamically reallocating resources based on current network state and applications requirements. An implementation and evaluation of ARM using the NS-2 simulation toolkit is also presented.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
2. Blake S, Black D, Carlson M, Davies E, Wang Z, Weiss W. An Architecture for Differentiated Services. RFC-2475. December 1998.
 
3
3. The network simulator (NS-2) Homepage. http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/
 
4
4. Nichols K, Jacobson V, Zhang L. A Two Bit Differentiated Services Architecture For The Internet. RFC-2638. July 1999.
 
5
5. Braden B, Ed B et al. Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP--Version 1 Functional Specification. IETF; RFC- 2205. September 1997.
 
6
6. Charny A. EF PHB Redefined. Internet Draft. November 2000.
 
7
7. Heinanen J, Baker F, Weiss W, Wroclawski J. Assured Forwarding PHB Group. RFC 2597. June 1999.
 
8
8. Differentiated Services testing at TF-TANT. http:// www.cnaf.infn.it/~ferrari/tfng/ds/
 
9
9. CSIRO and Autralian Academic and Research Network (AARNET) testbed.
 
10
10. University of Kansas IPQoS project. http://qos.ittc. ukans.edu/
 
11
11. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Differentiated Services page. http://diffserv.lcs.mit.edu/
 
12
12. Pieda P, Ethridge J, Baines M, Shallwani F. A Network Simulator Differentiated Services Implementation. Open IP, Nortel Networks. http://www7.nortel.com:8080/ CTL/
 
13
13. Reichmeyer F, Ong L, Terzis A, Zhang L, Yavatkar R. A Two-Tier Resource Management Model for Differentiated Services Networks. Internet Draft. November 1998.
 
14
14. Qbone signaling design team. http://qbone.inter- net2.edu/bb/
 
15
 
16
16. Policy Based Network Management Software by Orchestream. http://www.orchestream.com
 
17
17. Policy Based Bandwidth control and application prioritization software by Extremeware. http://www. extremenetworks.com/products/datasheets/entmngr.asp
 
18
18. Intel®, Policy-Based Network Management (PBNM). http://www.intel.com/labs/manage/pbnm/ index.htm
 
19
19. Foster I, Kesselman C, Lee C, Lindell B, Nahrstedt K, Roy A. A Distributed Resource Management Architecture that Supports Advance Reservations and Co-Allocations. Proceedings of the Globus Retreat (IWQoS '99), June 1999. http://www.globus.org/documentation/incoming/iwqos.pdf
 
20
 
21
21. Veciana G, Kesidis G, Walrand J. Resource management in wide-area ATM networks using effective bandwidths. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications May 1995, 1081-1090.
 
22
22. Ogawa J, Nomura Y. A Simple Resource Management Architecture for Differentiated Services. Proceedings of Internet Society (INET June 2000), 315-438.
 
23
23. Semeria C. Supporting Differentiated Service Classes: Active Queue Memory Management. White Paper, Juniper Networks Inc. http://www.juniper.net/ techcenter/techpapers/200021.html
 
24
24. Szabó R, Henk T, Rexhepi V, Karagiannis G. Resource Management in Differentiated Services (RMD) IP Networks. Proceedings of the International Conference on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies and Applications, ICETA 2001, 64-80, Kosice, Slovak Republic.
 
25
25. Simple Network Management Protocol Homepage. http://www.snmp.com
 
26
26. Durham D, Boyle J, Cohen R, Herzog S, Rajan R, Sastry A. The COPS (Common Open Policy Service) protocol. Internet Draft 2748. January 2000.
 
27
27. Heinanen J, Finland T, Guerin R. A Single Rate Three Color Marker. Internet draft. May 1999.
 
28
28. Heinanen J, Finland T, Guerin R. A Two Rate Three Color Marker. Internet draft. May 1999.
 
29
 
30
30. Fang W, Seddigh N, Nandy B. A Time Sliding Window Three Color Marker. Internet draft. March 2000.
 
31
 
32
 
33
33. CA*net II Differentiated Services Bandwidth Broker System Specification, British Columbia Institute of Technology (BCIT), Technology Centre Group for Advanced Information Technology, 1998.
 
34
34. Mahajan M, Parashar M. Content Aware Bandwidth Broker, Proc. of Fourth Annual International Workshop on Active Middleware Services. Network Services Session. 83-90, Edinburgh. Scotland, July 2001.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Manish Mahajan: colleagues
Ananthanarayanan Ramanathan: colleagues
Manish Parashar: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: