ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On the current state of transport layer protocols in mobile ad hoc networks
Full text PdfPdf (281 KB)
Source ACM Southeast Regional Conference archive
Proceedings of the 42nd annual Southeast regional conference table of contents
Huntsville, Alabama
SESSION: Special session on mobile computing #3 table of contents
Pages: 76 - 81  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-870-9
Authors
John Calagaz  Auburn University
Wade Chatam  Auburn University
Brian Eoff  Auburn University
John A. Hamilton  Auburn University
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 45,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/986537.986555
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we examine the current state of transport layer protocols for mobile ad hoc networks. TCP for wired networks offers poor performance in wireless settings because of its inability to distinguish packet loss due to congestion from packet loss due to bit errors or path change. To remedy this problem, many suggestions have been made for improvements to TCP as well as completely new transport layer protocols designed specifically for use in ad hoc environments. The use of a thin layer between the transport and network layers is also considered. This paper provides an objective look at many of these improvements and offers feedback on the strengths and weaknesses of each.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Dongkyun K., Toh, C. K., and Choi, Y. TCP-BuS: improving TCP performance in wireless ad hoc networks. In Communications, 2000 IEEE International Conference on, Volume: 3, (18--22 June 2000), 1707--1713.
 
2
Sun, D., and Man, H. Performance comparison of transport control protocols over mobile ad hoc networks. In Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications 12th IEEE International Symposium on, Volume: 2, (30 Sept.-3 Oct. 2001), G-83--G-87.
 
3
Sinha, P., Krishnamurthy, S. V., and Dao, S. Scalable unidirectional routing with zone routing protocol (ZRP) extensions for mobile ad-hoc networks. Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, IEEE, Volume: 3, (23--28 Sept. 2000).
4
 
5
Chandran, K., Sudarshan, R., Venkatesan, S., Prakash, R. A Feedback-Based Scheme for Improving TCP Performance in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks. In IEEE Personal Communications, (February 2001).
6
 
7
 
8
Marwaha, S., Tham, C. K., Srinivasan, D., A novel routing protocol using mobile agents and reactive route discovery for ad hoc wireless networks. Networks, 10th IEEE International Conference on, (27--30 Aug. 2002).
 
9
 
10
Liu, J. and Singh, S., ATP: Application controlled Transport Protocol for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks. Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 1999. IEEE, (21--24 Sept. 1999) 1318--1322 vol. 3.
11
 
12
Sun, D., and Man, H. ENIC - an improved reliable transport scheme for mobile ad hoc networks. Global Telecommunications Conference, 2001. GLOBECOM '01. IEEE, Volume: 5, (25--29 Nov. 2001).
 
13
Liu, J., Singh, S. ATCP: TCP for mobile ad hoc networks. Selected Areas in Communications, IEEE Journal on, Volume: 19 Issue: 7, (July 2001).
 
14
Tang, K., Obraczka, K., Sung-Ju Lee, and Geria, M., A reliable, congestion-control led multicast transport protocol in multimedia multi-hop networks. Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications, 2002. The 5th International Symposium on, Volume: 1, (27--30 Oct. 2002).
 
15

Collaborative Colleagues:
John Calagaz: colleagues
Wade Chatam: colleagues
Brian Eoff: colleagues
John A. Hamilton: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: