ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
From mental effort to perceived usability: transforming experiences into summary assessments
Full text PdfPdf (212 KB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
CHI '04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Vienna, Austria
SESSION: Late breaking result papers table of contents
Pages: 1283 - 1286  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-703-6
Authors
Marc Hassenzahl  Darmstadt University of Technology, Darmstadt, Germany
Nina Sandweg  Siemens Corporate Technology, München, Germany
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 17,   Downloads (12 Months): 115,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/985921.986044
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In many cases, practitioners and researchers of Human-Computer Interaction and Usability Engineering rely on users' subjective product quality assessments. Such an assessment of, for example, perceived usability is believed to summarize previous experiences made with the according software. The present study shows that such summary assessments of perceived usability do not reflect a whole experiential episode, but rather its most recent incidents. Additional measurement strategies, such as repeated measurements of perceived usability throughout the experiential episode, are explored.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Ariely, D and Carmon, Z. Summary assessment of experiences: The whole is different from the sum of its parts. In G. Loewenstein, D. Read, and R.F. Baumeister (Eds.), Time and decision. Economic and psychological perspectives on intertemporal choice. New York, Russell Sage, 2003.
 
3
Hassenzahl, M. The effect of perceived hedonic quality on product appealingness. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 13 (2002), 479--497.
 
4
Kahneman, D. Evaluation by moments. Past and future. In Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (Eds.), Choices, values and frames. New York, Cambridge University Press, 2000.
 
5
Ross, W. T. and Simonson, I. Evaluations of pairs of experiences: A preference for happy endings. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 4 (1991), 273--282.
 
6
Sandweg, N., Pedell, S., Platz, A., Schneider, K.-P., Honold, P., Hermann, D., and Kaiser, E. Re-design of CONNEXX hearing instruments fitting software. In H. Luczak, A. E. Cakir, and G. Cakir (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Work With Display Units. Berlin, ERGONOMIC Institut für Arbeits- und Sozialforschung (2002), 275--276.
 
7
Zijlstra, R. Efficiency in work behaviour. A design approach for modern tools. Delft, Delft University Press, 1993.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Marc Hassenzahl: colleagues
Nina Sandweg: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: