ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Probabilistic language analysis of weighted voting algorithms
Full text PdfPdf (679 KB)
Source Joint International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems archive
Proceedings of the 1990 ACM SIGMETRICS conference on Measurement and modeling of computer systems table of contents
Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, United States
Pages: 67 - 73  
Year of Publication: 1990
ISBN:0-89791-359-0
Also published in ...
Authors
Louise E. Moser  Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA
Vikas Kapur  Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA
P. M. Melliar-Smith  Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA
Sponsor
SIGMETRICS: ACM Special Interest Group on Measurement and Evaluation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 11,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/98457.98507
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We present a method of analyzing the performance of weighted voting algorithms in a fault-tolerant distributed system. In many distributed systems, some processors send messages more frequently than others and all processors share a common communication medium, such as an Ethernet. Typical fault-tolerant voting algorithms require that a certain minimum number of votes be collected from different processors. System performance is significantly affected by the time required to collect those votes. We formulate the problem of weighted voting in terms of probabilistic languages and then use the calculus of generating functions to compute the expected delay to collect that number of votes. An application of the method to a particular voting algorithm, the Total protocol, is given.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
Boneh, A. and Hofri, M. The coupon collector problem revisited, Technical Report ~549, Department of Computer Science, Technion, Haifa, Israel, Apr. 1989.
 
4
 
5
Feller, W. An introduction to probability theory and its applications, vol. 1, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1957.
 
6
Flajolet, P., Curdy, D. and Thimonier, L. Birthday paradox, coupon collectors, caching algorithms and self-organizing search, INRIA RC @720, Aug. 1987.
7
8
9
 
10
 
11
Moser, L. E., Melliar-Smith, P. M. and Agrawala, V. Asymptotic broadcast agreement protocols. Submitted for publication.
12
 
13
Tong, Z. and Kain, R. Y. Vote assignments in weighted voting mechanisms, Proceedings of 7th Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems, Oct. 1988, 138-143.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Louise E. Moser: colleagues
Vikas Kapur: colleagues
P. M. Melliar-Smith: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: