ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Understanding the under representation of women in IT: toward a theory of individual differences
Full text PdfPdf (214 KB)
Source Special Interest Group on Computer Personnel Research Annual Conference archive
Proceedings of the 2004 SIGMIS conference on Computer personnel research: Careers, culture, and ethics in a networked environment table of contents
Tucson, AZ, USA
SESSION: GEnder issues in IT organizations table of contents
Pages: 114 - 119  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-847-4
Authors
Eileen M. Trauth  The Pennsylvania State University
Jeria L. Quesenberry  The Pennsylvania State University
Allison J. Morgan  The Pennsylvania State University
Sponsors
SIGMIS: ACM Special Interest Group on Management Information Systems
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCPR: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Personnel Research
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12,   Downloads (12 Months): 160,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/982372.982400
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Among the research challenges in studying the under representation of women in the IT field is that of developing appropriate theory to provide a basis for understanding and explanation about this gender imbalance. At present, there are two dominant theories in the gender literature that are used to explain the participation of women in the IT profession. The essentialist perspective dichotomizes gender based upon the presumption of significant inherent differences between women and men. This view finds the causes of gender under representation in biology. The social construction perspective focuses on the social construction of IT as a male domain, which is interpreted as incompatible with the social construction of female identity. This view finds the causes of gender under representation in the IT sector. The research discussed in this paper is directed at the development of a new theory that focuses on individual differences among women as they relate to the needs and characteristics of IT work and the IT workplace. This view finds the causes of gender under representation in the socio-cultural environment that shapes each woman's gender identity and her professional development, and her individual responses to these influences.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Adam, A., Howcroft, D. and Richardson, H. (2001), "Stormy weather: the gender dimension of research debates in IS," International Federation for Information Processing, Working Group 8.2 Conference, Boise, Idaho, July 27-29.
 
2
Adam, A., Emms, J., Green, E., and Owen, J. (Eds) (1994), Women, Work and Computerization: Breaking Old Boundaries -- Building New Forms, North- Holland, Amsterdam.
 
3
Balka,E. and Smith, R. (Eds) (2000), Women, Work and Computerization: Charting a Course to the Future, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
 
4
Berger, P.L. and Luckmann, T. (1966), The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Doubleday, New York.
5
 
6
 
7
Cockburn, C. (1988), Machinery of Dominance: Women, Men, and Technical Know-how, Northeastern University Press, Boston.
 
8
Cockburn, C. and Ormrod, S. (1993), Gender and Technology in the Making, Sage, London.
 
9
Dennis, A.R., Kiney, S.T. and Hung, Y. (1999), "Gender differences in the effects of media richness," Small Group Research, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 405--437.
 
10
Eriksson, I.V., Kitchenham, B.A. and Tijdens, K.G. (Eds) (1991), Women, Work and Computerization: Understanding and Overcoming Bias in Work and Education, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
11
 
12
 
13
Jennings, H. H. (1941). Individual Differences in the Social Atom. Sociometry, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 269--277.
 
14
 
15
Kwan, S.K.; Trauth, E.M.; and Driehaus, K.C. (1985), "Gender differences and computing: students' assessment of societal influences," Education and Computing, Vol.1, No. 3, pp. 187--194.
 
16
 
17
Lovegrove, G. and Segal, B. (Eds) (1991), Women into Computing: Selected Papers 1988-1990, Springer-Verlag, London.
 
18
Marini, M. M. (1990). Sex and Gender: What Do We Know? Sociological Forum, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 95--120.
 
19
McCauley, C. and Thangavelu, K. (1991). Individual Differences in Sex Stereotyping of Occupations and Personality Traits. Social Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 54, No. 3, pp. 267--279.
 
20
 
21
Nielsen, S., von Hellens, L. and Wong, S. (2000), The Game of Social Constructs: We're Going to WinIT! Griffith University, School of Computing and Information Technology Working Paper Series. Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.
22
 
23
Nielsen, S., von Hellens, L., Pringle, R. and Greenhill, A. (1999), "Students' perceptions of information technology careers: conceptualising the influence of cultural and gender factors for IT education," GATES, Vol. 5, No.1, pp. 30--38.
 
24
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
Trauth, E.M. (2003). "Diversity, Gender and the IT Professions," Gender and IT Workshop, University of Salford, Manchester, UK, May.
 
30
Trauth, E.M. (2002), "Odd Girl Out: An Individual Differences Perspective on Women in the IT Profession," Information Technology and People, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 98--118.
 
31
 
32
Trauth, E.M. (1995), "Women in Ireland's information industry: voices from inside," Eire-Ireland, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 133--150.
 
33
 
34
Trauth, E.M., Farwell, D. and Lee, D. (1993), "The IS expectation gap: industry expectations versus academic preparation," MIS Quarterly, Vol.17, No.3, pp. 293--307.
 
35
Trauth, E.M., Nielsen, S. and von Hellens, S. (2000), "Explaining the IT gender gap: Australian Stories," Proceedings of the 10th Australasian Conference on Information Systems.
 
36
Trauth, E.M., Nielsen, S.H., and von Hellens, L.A. 2003. "Explaining the IT Gender Gap: Australian Stories for the New Millennium," Journal of Research and Practice in IT, Volume 35, Number 1: 7--20.
 
37
38
39
 
40
Wajcman, J. (1991), Feminism Confronts Technology, The Pennsylvania University Press, University Park, PA.
 
41
Webster, J. (1996), Shaping Women's Work: Gender, Employment and Information Technology, Longman, London.
 
42
Wilson, M. and Howcroft, D. (2000), "The role of gender in user resistance and information systems failure," in Baskerville, R., Stage, J. and DeGross, J.I. (Eds), Organizational and Social Perspectives on Information Technology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.

CITED BY  6

Collaborative Colleagues:
Eileen M. Trauth: colleagues
Jeria L. Quesenberry: colleagues
Allison J. Morgan: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: