ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Organizational survival and alignment: insights into conflicting perspectives on the role of the IT professional
Full text PdfPdf (188 KB)
Source Special Interest Group on Computer Personnel Research Annual Conference archive
Proceedings of the 2004 SIGMIS conference on Computer personnel research: Careers, culture, and ethics in a networked environment table of contents
Tucson, AZ, USA
SESSION: Job alignment in organizations table of contents
Pages: 30 - 34  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-847-4
Authors
Indira R. Guzman  Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY
Michelle L. Kaarst-Brown  Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY
Sponsors
SIGMIS: ACM Special Interest Group on Management Information Systems
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCPR: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Personnel Research
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12,   Downloads (12 Months): 110,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/982372.982379
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Different organizational theories clearly define critical organizational activities necessary for organizational survival. Recent attention to "hybrid" research that links organizational theory with MIS research has been proposed to lend new insights into strategic alignment of IT (Orlikowski & Barley, 2000; Zmud, 2002). One gap still to be addressed relates to role expectations and skills required by the IT professional according to different organizational theories. Much of the literature on strategic alignment of IT emphasizes the value provided by the IT artifact or focuses on communication between IT and business management, rather than on the role of IT professionals inferred by critical survival activities outlined in different organizational theories.Motivated by organizational concerns related to the clarity and articulation of the role of Information Technology professionals in contributing to strategic alignment, our study reviews literature about the role of the information technology professional and the differences according to three organizational theories: Agency theory, Transaction Cost theory and Institutional theory. We then use bibliometrics and content analysis to analyze published research for implicit or explicit skill expectations and contributions to organizational survival and strategic alignment of IT. The goal of our study is to contribute to a better understanding of role conflict, skill expectations, and value of information technology professionals in organizations, and also contribute to a consolidation between information systems research and organizational studies.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Chan, Y. E., Huff, S. L., Barclay, D. W., and Copeland, D. G. "Business Strategy Orientation, Information Systems Orientation and Strategic Alignment," Information Systems Research (8:2), 1997, pp. 125--150.
 
3
DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell W.W. "The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields," American Sociological Review 48, 1983, pp. 47--160.
 
4
Eisenhardt, K.M. "Building Theories From Case Study Research." Academy of Management Review (14:4), 1989, pp. 532--550.
5
 
6
Giddens, A. Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 1979.
 
7
Jensen, M.C. & Meckling W.H. "Specific and General Knowledge and Organizational Science" In Contract Economics, edited by L. Wetin and J. Wijkander. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1992.
 
8
Kaarst-Brown, M.L. and Robey, D. "More on Myth, Magic and Metaphor: Cultural Insights into the Management of Information Technology in Organizations", Information Technology and People, (12:2), 1999, pp. 192--218.
 
9
Kakabadse, A. and Korac-Kakabadse, N. "Leading the pack: future role of IS/IT professionals." The Journal of Management Development (19:2), 2000, pp. 97--155.
10
 
11
 
12
Morgan, G. Images of Organisation. California: Sage, 1986.
 
13
Oliver, C.M. "A framework for comparing organizational theories" Unpublished teaching materials, 1988.
 
14
Oliver, C.M. "Strategic responses to institutional processes", Academy of Management Review, 16, 1991, pp. 145--179.
15
 
16
Orlikowski, W.J. & Barley, S.R. "Technology and Institutions: What Can Research on Information Technology and Research on Organizations Learn from Each Other?" MIS Quarterly, 25, 2001, pp. 145--165.
 
17
 
18
Orlikowski, W.J. and Robey, D. "Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations," Information Systems Research (2:2), June 1991
 
19
 
20
21
 
22
Scott, R. Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 5th Edition, 2002.
 
23
 
24
White, H.D., & McCain, K.W. "Bibliometrics". Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 24, 1989, pp. 119--186.
 
25
Williamson, O.E. Markets and hierarchies, analysis and antitrust implications: A study in the economics of internal organization. New York: Free Press, 1975.
 
26
Zmud, R. "Special Issue on Redefining the Organizational Roles of Information Technology in the Information Age" MIS Quarterly. September, (26:3), 2002, p. 177.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Indira R. Guzman: colleagues
Michelle L. Kaarst-Brown: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: