ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Fault secureness need for next generation high performance microprocessor design for testability structures
Full text PdfPdf (999 KB)
Source Conference On Computing Frontiers archive
Proceedings of the 1st conference on Computing frontiers table of contents
Ischia, Italy
SESSION: Processors table of contents
Pages: 444 - 450  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-741-9
Authors
C. Metra  University of Bologna, Italy
T. M. Mak  Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA
M. Omaña  University of Bologna, Italy
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGMICRO: ACM Special Interest Group on Microarchitectural Research and Processing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 7,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/977091.977153
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We analyze the risks associated with faults affecting some Design For Testability (DFT) features employed within todays' high performance microprocessors. We will show that, because of the occurrence of internal faults, some of these structures may become useless, with consequent dramatic impact on test effectiveness and product quality. We borrow the Fault Secure property, that is well known for Self-Checking Circuits, for DFT structures. We will show that it guarantees that no escapes or false acceptance of faulty products may occur because of faults affecting the employed DFT structures. We will discuss the Fault Secureness of the considered DFT structures. We will provide some examples of how the non Fault Secure ones can be modified to meet the Fault Secure goal, thus avoiding their prospected detrimental effect on next generation high performance microprocessors test effectiveness and quality.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
"Semiconductor Industry Assoc., San Jose, Calif.," The 2001 International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors, 2001.
 
2
 
3
 
4
M. Tripp, T.M. Mak, A. Meixner, "Elimination of Traditional Functional Testing of Interface Timings at Intel", in Proc. of Int. Test Conf., 2003, pp. 1014--1022.
 
5
 
6
 
7
H. Vranken, F. Meister, H.-J. Wunderlich "Combining Deterministic Logic BIST with Test Point Insertion", in Proc. of IEEE European Test Workshop, 2002, pp. 389--394.
 
8
 
9
 
10
J. E. Smith and G. Metze, "Strongly Fault-Secure Logic Networks," IEEE Trans. Comput., vol. C-27, pp. 491--499, June 1978.
 
11
W. C. Carter and P. R. Schneider, "Design of Dynamically Checked Computers," in Proc. IFIP '68, Edinburgh, Scotland, pp. 878--883, 1968.
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
M. L. Bushnell, V. D. 12, "Essential of Electronic Testing", Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.
 
16
 
17
 
18
Y. Zorian, "A Distributed BIST Control Scheme for Complex VLSI Devices", pp. 4--9, 1993.
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
M. Omaña, D. Rossi, C. Metra, "Low Cost and High Speed Embedded Two-Rail Code Checker", submitted to the IEEE Transactions on Computers.

Collaborative Colleagues:
C. Metra: colleagues
T. M. Mak: colleagues
M. Omaña: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: