ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Deep in budget restraints: return on investment (ROI)
Full text PdfPdf (168 KB)
Source User Services Conference archive
Proceedings of the 31st annual ACM SIGUCCS conference on User services table of contents
San Antonio, TX, USA
Pages: 38 - 40  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-665-X
Authors
Terry Robb  University of Missouri - Columbia, Columbia, MO
Joleen Pfefer  University of Missouri - Columbia, Columbia, MO
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 24,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/947469.947481
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The University of Missouri-Columbia's Information and Access Technology (IAT) Services division's InfoTech Training department measures IT training using the return on investment (ROI) methodology. The ROI measurement estimates a campus-wide financial return in staff productivity through more efficient use of software features. In fiscal year 2002 (July 1, 2001 to June 30, 2002), InfoTech Training's program calculated a 218% ROI.Senior IT management uses ROI methodology in part for resource allocation decisions. ROI measurement is particularly crucial during tight budget times and can help justify the investment in training staff, hardware, software, classroom maintenance, and instructional materials.The InfoTech training manager uses ROI to identify inefficient programs in need of redesign or elimination, and identify successful programs in need of expansion. This paper explores the challenges of: Collecting and Analyzing Data and Determining a Return on Investment.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Salois, Gene. "Case Studies in the ROI of Training". Chief Learning Officer, March 2003, pp. 41--3, p. 59, and p. 64. Also, http://www.clomedia.com/content/templates/clo_feature.asp?articleid=132&zoneid=31
 
2
Carliner, Saul, Ph.D. "Demonstrating the Effectiveness and Value of Technical Communication Products and Services: A Four-Level Process". Frederickson Communications website (www.fredricksoncommunications.com), August 2001.
 
3
Kirkpatrick, D.L., Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. San Francisco, CA: Berret-Koehler Publishers, 1994.
 
4
American Society of Training & Development (ASTD) Training Outcomes Benchmarking Report, Part II-B Follow-Up Evaluation, 2002.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Terry Robb: colleagues
Joleen Pfefer: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: