ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On-chip communication design: roadblocks and avenues
Full text PdfPdf (125 KB)
Source International Symposium on Systems Synthesis archive
Proceedings of the 1st IEEE/ACM/IFIP international conference on Hardware/software codesign and system synthesis table of contents
Newport Beach, CA, USA
SESSION: Invited session B table of contents
Pages: 75 - 76  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-742-7
Authors
Luca P. Carloni  UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
Alberto L. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli  UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 8,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/944645.944666
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The semiconductor industry is experiencing a paradigm shift from "computation-bound design" to "communication-bound design": the number of transistors that can be reached in a clock cycle, and not those that can be integrated on a chip, will drive the design process. Interconnect latency will have a major impact on the design of on-chip communication architectures, which increasingly rely on wire pipelining to go beyond the capabilities of traditional wire buffering. The insertion of stateful repeaters on long wires, instead of simply stateless repeaters, carries major consequences for the synchronous design methodology. This is the foundation of the design ows for the majority of commercial chips today, but, if left unchanged, will lead to an exacerbation of the timing closure problem for tomorrows design ows. New methodologies that regard the chip as a distributed system are necessary. Latency-insensitive design is a step in this direction.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
M. Bohr. Interconnect Scaling - The Real Limiter to High Performance ULSI. IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting, pages 241--244, Dec. 1995.
 
3
 
4
 
5
L. P. Carloni, K. L. McMillan, and A. L. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli. Theory of latency-insensitive design. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, 20(9):1059--1076, Sept. 2001.
 
6
 
7
L. P. Carloni and A. L. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli. A formal modeling framework for deploying synchronous designs on distributed architectures. In FMGALS 2003: Formal Methods for Globally Asynchronous Locally Asynchronous Architecture, Sept. 2003.
8
9
 
10
J. A. Davis, R. Venkatesan, A. Kaloyeros, M. Beylansky, S. Souri, K. Banerjee, K. Saraswat, A. Rahman, R. Reif, and J. Meindl. Interconnect Limits on Gigascale Integration (GSI) in the 21st Century. Proc. of the IEEE, 89(3):305--324, Mar. 2001.
 
11
R. Ho, K. Mai, and M. Horowitz. The Future of Wires. Proc. of the IEEE, 89(4):490--504, Apr. 2001.
 
12
 
13
 
14
J. D. Meindl. Interconnect opportunites for gigascale integration. IEEE Micro, 2003.
15


Collaborative Colleagues:
Luca P. Carloni: colleagues
Alberto L. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: