ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Ensuring fairness among ECN and non-ECN TCP over the internet
Full text PdfPdf (163 KB)
Source International Journal of Network Management archive
Volume 13 ,  Issue 5  (September 2003) table of contents
Pages: 337 - 348  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISSN:1099-1190
Authors
Salahuddin Muhammad Salim Zabir  Research Institute of Electrical Communications (RIEC), Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
Ahmed Ashir  Japan Gigabit Network R&D Project, Telecommunication Advancement Organization, Tohoku University Office
Gen Kitagata  Research Institute of Electrical Communications (RIEC), Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
Takuo Suganuma  Research Institute of Electrical Communications (RIEC), Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
Norio Shiratori  Research Institute of Electrical Communications (RIEC), Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 3,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: 10.1002/nem.490

ABSTRACT

Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) has been proved to provide a fast indication of incipient congestion and thus better the performance of a TCP/IP network. In this work, we carry out investigations on gateway or router performance in providing fairnesss when both FIM ECN-capable and non-ECN-capable connections are employed. We propose a new packet-dropping scheme called Fair In-time Dropping (FID) which drops packets from a connection upon detecting an incipient indication of congestion depending on its share of gateway or router buffer occupancy. We also show that a combination of FIM and FID offers the best fairness compared with a combination of FIM along with other dropping schemes.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
 
3
3. Ramakrishnan K, Floyd S. Aproposal to add Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) to IP. RFC 2481, January 1999.
 
4
4. Salim JH, Ahmed U. Performance evaluation of Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) in IP networks. RFC 2884, July 2000.
 
5
5. Zabir SMS, Ashir A, Shiratori N. Providing fair service over the Internet: an approach based on packet marking. Proc. International Conference on Internet Computing, IC'2001, 2001, 609-615.
 
6
6. Ashir A, Zabir SMS, Suganuma T, Shiratori N. An evaluation of performance improvement of different TCP congestion control scheme using ECN. Proc. SNPD'2001, 2001, 532-539.
 
7
7. Zabir SMS, Ashir A, Shiratori N. An efficient approach to performance improvement of different TCP enhancements using ECN. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems 2002; E-85D, No. 8, August, 1250-1257.
 
8
8. Zabir SMS, Ashir A, Shiratori N. Ensuring fair service to TCP connections. Proc. IEICE Workshop on Information and Electrical Communication, Vol. 101, No. 287, 2001, 71-76.
 
9
9. Gibbens RJ, Kelly FP. Resource pricing and the evolution of congestion control. Automatica 35, 1999.
 
10
 
11
11. Braden B. et al. Recommendations on queue Management and congestion avoidance in the Internet. RFC 2309, April 1998.
 
12
12. Stevens W. TCP slow start, congestion avoidance, fast retransmit, and fast recovery algorithms. RFC 2001, January 1997.
 
13
 
14
14. Hasegawa G, Matsuo T, Murata M, Miyahara H. Comparisons of packet scheduling algorithms for fair service among connections on the Internet. Proc. IEEE INFO-COM 2000, 2000.
 
15
15. Bagal P, Kalyanaraman S, Packer B. Comparative study of RED, ECN and TCP rate control. Available at http://www.packeteer.com/technology/pdf/ packeteer-final.pdf
 
16
16. Yin N, Hluchyj MG. Implication of dropping packets from the front of a queue. Proc. 7th ITC, 1990.
 
17
17. Lakshman TV, Neidhardt A, Ott TJ. The drop from front strategy in TCP and in TCP over ATM. Proc. IEEE INFOCOM 1996, 1996.
 
18
18. UCB/LBNL/VINT Network Simulator--ns (version 2), available at http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/.
 
19
19. Jain R. The Art of Computer System Performance Analysis , John Wiley, New York, 1991.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Salahuddin Muhammad Salim Zabir: colleagues
Ahmed Ashir: colleagues
Gen Kitagata: colleagues
Takuo Suganuma: colleagues
Norio Shiratori: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: