ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A delay-tolerant network architecture for challenged internets
Full text PdfPdf (100 KB)
Source Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication archive
Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications table of contents
Karlsruhe, Germany
SESSION: Position papers table of contents
Pages: 27 - 34  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-735-4
Author
Kevin Fall  Intel Research, Berkeley, CA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCOMM: ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 70,   Downloads (12 Months): 606,   Citation Count: 139
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/863955.863960
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The highly successful architecture and protocols of today's Internet may operate poorly in environments characterized by very long delay paths and frequent network partitions. These problems are exacerbated by end nodes with limited power or memory resources. Often deployed in mobile and extreme environments lacking continuous connectivity, many such networks have their own specialized protocols, and do not utilize IP. To achieve interoperability between them, we propose a network architecture and application interface structured around optionally-reliable asynchronous message forwarding, with limited expectations of end-to-end connectivity and node resources. The architecture operates as an overlay above the transport layers of the networks it interconnects, and provides key services such as in-network data storage and retransmission, interoperable naming, authenticated forwarding and a coarse-grained class of service.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
J. Alonso, K. Fall, "A Linear Programming Formulation of Flows over Time with Piecewise Constant Capacity and Transit Times", Intel Research Technical Report IRB-TR-03-007, June 2003.
 
2
Border et. al., "Performance Enhancing Proxies Intended to Mitigate Link-Related Degradations", Internet RFC3135, June 2001.
 
3
V. Cerf et. al., "Interplanetary Internet (IPN): Architectural Definition", http://www.ipnsig.org/reports/memo-ipnrg-arch-00.pdf.
 
4
V. Cerf, R. Kahn, "A Protocol for Packet Network Inter- communication", IEEE Trans. on Comm., COM-22(5), May 1974 CFDP Protocol Specification, CCSDS 727.0-B-1, Jan 2002, http://www.ccsds.org.
 
5
CFDP Protocol Specification, CCSDS 727.0-B-1, Jan 2002, http://www.ccsds.org
 
6
E. Chen, J. Stewart, "A Framework for Inter-Domain Route Aggregation", Internet RFC2519, Feb 1999.
7
 
8
K. Fall, "A Delay-Tolerant Network Architecture for Challenged Internets", Intel Research Technical. Report IRB-TR-03-003, Feb 2003.
 
9
D. Feldmeier, A. McAuley, J. Smith, D. Bakin, W. Marcus, T. Raleigh, "Protocol Boosters", IEEE JSAC, Apr 1998.
 
10
M. Gritter, D. Cheriton, "An Architecture for Content Routing Support in the Internet", Proc. Usenix USITS, March 2001.
11
12
 
13
M. Mealling, R. Denenbers, eds., "Report from the Joint W3C/IETF URI Planning Interest Group: Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs), URLs, and Uniform Resource Names (URNs): Clarifications and Recommendations", Internet RFC 3305, Aug 2002.
 
14
D. Mills, "Network Time Protocol (Version 3) Specification, Implementation and Analysis", Internet RFC1305, Mar 1992.
 
15
D. Mills, H. Nair, "Timekeeping in the Interplanetary Internet", in progress, http//:www.eecis.udel.edu/ mills/ipin.html.
16
 
17
R. Shah, S. Roy, S. Jain, W. Brunette, "Data MULEs: Modeling a Three-tier Architecture for Sparse Sensor Networks", IEEE SNPA Workshop, May 2003.
18
 
19
J. Sterbenz, T. Saxena, R. Krishnan, "Latency-Aware Information Access with User-Directed Fetch Behaviour for Weakly-Connected Mobile Wireless Clients", BBN Tech. Report 8340, May 2002.
 
20
A. Vahdat, D. Becker, "Epidemic Routing for Partially-Connected Ad Hoc Networks", Duke Tech Report CS-2000-06, 2000.
21
 
22
J. Wroclawski, "The MetaNet: White Paper", Workshop on Research Directions for the Next Generation Internet", May 1997, http://www.cra.org/Policy/NGI/papers/wroklawWP.

CITED BY  144
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: