| Mediating the views of databases and database users |
| Full text |
Pdf
(141 KB)
|
| Source
|
International Conference on Management of Data
archive
Proceedings of the 1980 workshop on Data abstraction, databases and conceptual modeling
table of contents
Pingree Park, Colorado, United States
Pages: 131 - 132
Year of Publication: 1980
ISBN:0-89791-031-1
Also published in ...
|
|
Author
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4, Downloads (12 Months): 22, Citation Count: 1
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
The Natural-Language/Deduction group at SRI International has undertaken several large projects integrating knowledge representation, the modeling and use of distributed conventional databases, logical deduction, and natural-language processing. One of the largest projects, LADDER [2], involved accessing data distributed over a computer network by using queries expressed in English. Work with LADDER (and several similar systems) has revealed that: (1) Users wish to talk about data in terms of the enterprise in which the data are to be used. Users do not confine their questions to concepts and terminology covered by the database per se. (2) Users are seldom satisfied with access only to the data in a database. They need to know the KIND of data available (i.e., they want to ask questions about the DB schema), and they expect systems to include information that can be computed from “common knowledge” and information stored explicitly in the database (e.g., if a database records where two ships are, users expect the system to know the distance between them). (3) Users are not satisfied with access to an existing database. They want to tell the system new facts. Some of these are not suitable for storage in conventional databases (e.g., statements involving quantification), and some involve counter factuals (e.g., “Suppose the ship were 100 miles south of its current location...”). (4) Given natural-language access to a DBMS, users expect to interact in natural language with other types of software, too. Moreover, they expect the various underlying software packages to understand one another's results (e.g., User: “Who is the commander of the ship?” System: “Admiral Brown.” User: “Send him a copy of Smith's memo.” The mailer is expected to understand the output from the database).
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Haas, N. and Hendrix, G. G. "An Approach to Acquiring and Applying Knowledge." Proceedings of the First Annual National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Stanford, California, August 18-21, 1980, pages 235-239.
|
 |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
Epstein, M. N., and Walker, D. E. "Natural Language Access to a Melanoma Data Base." Proceedings of the Second Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. Washington, D. C., 5-8 November 1978.
|
Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read:
-
Data structures for quadtree approximation and compression
Communications of the ACM
28, 9
Hanan Samet
-
A hierarchical single-key-lock access control using the Chinese remainder theorem
Proceedings of the 1992 ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied computing
Kim S. Lee
, Huizhu Lu
, D. D. Fisher
-
Putting innovation to work: adoption strategies for multimedia communication systems
Communications of the ACM
34, 12
Ellen Francik
, Susan Ehrlich Rudman
, Donna Cooper
, Stephen Levine
-
The GemStone object database management system
Communications of the ACM
34, 10
Paul Butterworth
, Allen Otis
, Jacob Stein
-
An intelligent component database for behavioral synthesis
Proceedings of the 27th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference on
Gwo-Dong Chen
, Daniel D. Gajski
|