ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Mediating the views of databases and database users
Full text PdfPdf (141 KB)
Source International Conference on Management of Data archive
Proceedings of the 1980 workshop on Data abstraction, databases and conceptual modeling table of contents
Pingree Park, Colorado, United States
Pages: 131 - 132  
Year of Publication: 1980
ISBN:0-89791-031-1
Also published in ...
Author
Gary G. Hendrix  SRI International, 333 Ravenswood Avenue, Menlo Park, ca
Sponsors
NBS : National Bureau of Standards
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
SIGMOD: ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data
SIGPLAN: ACM Special Interest Group on Programming Languages
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 22,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/800227.806898
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The Natural-Language/Deduction group at SRI International has undertaken several large projects integrating knowledge representation, the modeling and use of distributed conventional databases, logical deduction, and natural-language processing. One of the largest projects, LADDER [2], involved accessing data distributed over a computer network by using queries expressed in English. Work with LADDER (and several similar systems) has revealed that: (1) Users wish to talk about data in terms of the enterprise in which the data are to be used. Users do not confine their questions to concepts and terminology covered by the database per se. (2) Users are seldom satisfied with access only to the data in a database. They need to know the KIND of data available (i.e., they want to ask questions about the DB schema), and they expect systems to include information that can be computed from “common knowledge” and information stored explicitly in the database (e.g., if a database records where two ships are, users expect the system to know the distance between them). (3) Users are not satisfied with access to an existing database. They want to tell the system new facts. Some of these are not suitable for storage in conventional databases (e.g., statements involving quantification), and some involve counter factuals (e.g., “Suppose the ship were 100 miles south of its current location...”). (4) Given natural-language access to a DBMS, users expect to interact in natural language with other types of software, too. Moreover, they expect the various underlying software packages to understand one another's results (e.g., User: “Who is the commander of the ship?” System: “Admiral Brown.” User: “Send him a copy of Smith's memo.” The mailer is expected to understand the output from the database).


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Haas, N. and Hendrix, G. G. "An Approach to Acquiring and Applying Knowledge." Proceedings of the First Annual National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Stanford, California, August 18-21, 1980, pages 235-239.
2
 
3
Epstein, M. N., and Walker, D. E. "Natural Language Access to a Melanoma Data Base." Proceedings of the Second Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. Washington, D. C., 5-8 November 1978.



Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: