Personality and programming: Time-sharing vs. batch preference

ABSTRACT

Only within the past ten years has some attention been given to psychological concerns of human-machine interface. A review of the literature in this area reveals that personality has received the least attention, but interest is growing. If critical personality factors can be isolated and associated with particular programming tasks, such information could be a useful tool for education as well as management. The hypothesis of this exploratory study was that two personality dimensions, assertiveness and locus of control, influence a programmer's choice of batch or interactive processing for program development. Locus of control relates to the perception an individual has of his/her influence over events. Assertiveness allows an individual expression in a manner that fully communicates personal desires without infringing upon the rights of others. These two dimensions and the programmer's preference for batch or interactive mode were studied through a questionnaire survey of experienced programmers.

REFERENCES

• 1: Cancro, R. and Slotnick, D. L., Computer Graphics and Resistance to Technology, American Journal of Psychotherapy (July 1970) 24, No. 3, pp. 461-469.
• 2: Sackman, H., Man-Computer Problem Solving (Princeton, NJ: Auerbach Publishers Inc., 1970).
• 3: Singleton, W. T., Theoretical Approaches to Human Errors, Ergonomics, 16, No. 6 (Nov. 1973) pp. 727-737.
• 4: Bell, D., Programmer Selection and Programming Errors, The Computer Journal, 19, No. 3, pp. 202.
• 5: Boies, S. J., User Behavior on an Interactive Computer System, IBM Systems Journal, 13, No. 1 (1974).
• 6: Gould, John D., Some Psychological Evidence on How People Debug Computer Programs, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 7 (1975) pp. 151-182.
• 7: Youngs, E. A., Human Errors in Programming, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 6, 3, (1974).
• 8: Thomas, J. C. and Gould, J. D., A Psychological Study of Query by Example, National Computer Conference, 1975, pp. 439-445.
• 9: Reisner, P. Use of Psychological Experimentation as an Aid to Development of A Query Language. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 3, (1977), 218-229.
• 10: Lyle B. Smith, A comparison of batch processing and instant turnaround, Communications of the ACM, v.10 n.8, p.495-500, Aug. 1967 [doi>10.1145/363534.363552]
• 11: M. Schatzoff , R. Tsao , R. Wing, An experimental comparison of time sharing and batch processing, Communications of the ACM, v.10 n.5, p.261-265, May 1967 [doi>10.1145/363282.363292]
• 12: Michael M. Gold, Time-sharing and batch-processing: an experimental comparison of their values in a problem-solving situation, Communications of the ACM, v.12 n.5, p.249-259, May 1969 [doi>10.1145/362946.362958]
• 13: Sackman, H., Experimental Analysis of Man-Computer Problem-solving, Human Factors, 12, (1970) pp. 187-196.
• 14: Boillot, Michel, Computer Communication Modes and Their Effect on Student Attitudes Towards Programming, A practicum, Nova University (April 1974) available through ERIC.
• 15: Shneiderman, B., Human Factors Experiments for Developing Quality Software, State of the Art Report on Software Reliability (Berkshire, England: Infotech, 1977).
• 16: David R. Cheriton, Man-machine interface design for timesharing systems, Proceedings of the annual conference, p.362-366, October 20-22, 1976, Houston, Texas, United States [doi>10.1145/800191.805617]
• 17: Miller, L. A. and Thomas, J. C., Jr., Behavioral Issues in the Use of Interactive Systems, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 9 (1977) pp. 509-536.
• 18: Kennedy, T.C.S., The Design of Interactive Procedures for Man-Machine Communication, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 6 (1974) pp.309-334.
• 19: Brown, T. and Klerer, M., The Effect of Language Design on Time-Sharing Operational Efficiency, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 7 (1975) pp. 233-247.
• 20: James Martin, Design of Man-Computer Dialogues, Prentice Hall Professional Technical Reference, 1990
• 21: Ben Shneiderman, Improving the human factors aspect of database interactions, ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), v.3 n.4, p.417-439, Dec. 1978 [doi>10.1145/320289.320295]
• 22: Treu, S., Interactive Command Language Design Based on Required Mental Work, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 7, (1975) pp. 135-149.
• 23: Fitter, M., Information Systems and Individual Behavior, Medical Research Council, Social and Applied Psychology Unit, Sheffield University, England.
• 24: Gannon, J. D., and Horning, J. J., The Impact of Language Design on the Production of Reliable Software, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 1, 2, (1975), pp. 179-191.
• 25: Shneiderman, B., Exploratory Experiments in Programmer Behavior, International Journal of Computer and Information Sciences 5,2, (June 1976), 123-143.
• 26: Shneiderman, B., Perceptual and Cognitive Issues in the Syntactic/Semantic Model of Programmer Behavior, Proceedings of Symposium on Human Factors in Computer Systems, June 1, 1978 Computer Systems Group of the Human Factors Symposium.
• 27: Doktor, R., Cognitive Style and the Use of Computers and Management, Management Datamatics, 5, No. 2 (1976).
• 28: Zmud, R., Performance with and Appreciation of Interactive Information Systems: The Effects of Think-Time and Cognitive Style, presented at ORSA/TIMS Conference, Atlanta, GA 1977.
• 29: Zmud. R., Perceptual Investigation of the Cognitive Implications of Decision Style Theory, Department of Management, School of Business, Auburn University, 1977.
• 30: Bariff, M. L. and Lusk, E. J., Cognitive and Personality Tests for the Design of Management Information Systems, Management Science, 23, No. 8, (April 1977) pp. 820-829.
• 31: Zmud, R., Behavioral Considerations for Decision Support System Design, Department of Management, School of Business, Auburn University, Nov. 1976.
• 32: Wynne, B. E. and Dickson, G. W., Experienced Managers' Performance in Experimental Man-Machine Decision System Simulation, Academy of Management Journal, 18, No. 1 (1976), pp. 25-40.
• 33: Peter R. Newsted, Grade and ability predictions in an introductory programming course, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.7 n.2, p.87-91, June 1975 [doi>10.1145/382205.382897]
• 34: Rotter, J.B., Generalized Expectancies for Internal vs. External Control of Reinforcement, Psychological Monographs, 80, No. 1 (1966) pp. 1-28.
• 35: Tyler, F. B., Gatz, M. and Keenan, K., A Structure-Factor Matrix Analysis of the Rotter I-E Scale, Journal of Personality (in press).
• 36: Winship, B. J. and Kelley, J.D., A Verbal Response Model of Assertiveness, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 23, No. 3 (1976), pp. 215-220.
• 37: Reichard, B. D., Jr., The Effects of a Management Training Workshop on Alternating Locus of Control, Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation, (1975).
• 38: G. M. Weinberg, The psychology of computer programming, Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York, NY, 1988
• 39: Robinson, J. P. and Shover, P. R., Scale to Measure Internal vs. External Control, Measures of Social Psychological Attitudes, pp. 143-145.
• 40: Ritchie, Malcolm, Human Factors in the Long Run, Human Factors, 12, (April 1970), pp. 153-157.
• 41: Rathus, S., A 30-item Schedule for Assessing Assertive Behavior, Behavior Therapy, No. 4 (1973) pp. 398-406.
• 42: Edwards, A. L. Experimental Design in Psychological Research, 3rd Ed. (New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., 1968), pp. 80-104.
• 43: Jones, Janie L., Personality in Vocational Occupations, Dissertation Abstracts International, 30, (1970) pp. 4223.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES
      H.1.2 User/Machine Systems

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES
      H.1.2 User/Machine Systems
          Subjects: Software psychology

General Terms:
Design, Languages, Management, Theory

Keywords:
Assertive/passive, Batch processing, Locus of control, Personality, Programming, Psychology, Time sharing