ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A performance model for hardware/software issues in computer-aided design of protocol systems
Full text PdfPdf (563 KB)
Source Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication archive
Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM symposium on Communications architectures and protocols: tutorials & symposium table of contents
Montréal, Quebec, Canada, United States
Pages: 132 - 139  
Year of Publication: 1984
ISBN:0-89791-136-9
Also published in ...
Authors
C. M. Woodside  Department of Systems & Computer Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada
R. Montealegre  Department of Systems & Computer Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada
R. J. A. Buhr  Department of Systems & Computer Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada
Sponsor
SIGCOMM: ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 15,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/800056.802070
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Protocol execution can run into bottlenecks which are due to implementation decisions rather than to the protocol rules. The performance effects of processor saturation, buffer management strategy, allocation of functions between host and front-end, and hardware-software interactions due to special hardware attributes can, in principle, be predicted at the design stage by analytic performance models. The paper describes the process of construction of such a model for the data transfer stage of a simple transport protocol resembling an OSI class 4 protocol, including queueing for critical sections which protect the buffer pools and connection state information. The model is part of a computer-aided design process for communications systems, currently under development.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
M. Gerla, L. Kleinrock, "Flow Control, A Comparative Survey," IEEE Trans. on Communications, COM-28, pp 553-574, 1980.
 
2
M. Reiser, "A Queueing Network Analysis of Computer Communication Networks with Window Flow Control," IEEE Trans. on Communications, COM-27, pp 1199-1209, 1979.
 
3
W. Dieterle, "A Simulation Study of CCITT X.25: Throughput Classes and Window Flow Control," Proc. Tenth International Teletraffic Congress, pp 3.3 - 6-1 to 3.3 - 6-8, May 1983.
4
5
 
6
International Organization for Standardization, Transport Protocol Specification, Document ISO/TC 97/SC 16 N 1169, June 1982.
 
7
 
8
CRYSTAL User's Guide, Release 1.0, BGS Systems Inc., Waltham, Mass., 1981.
 
9
R.J.A. Buhr, G.M. Karam, C.M. Woodside, "Towards Computer-Aided Design of Systems to Implement Communication Protocols." Report SCE 83-8, Dept. of Systems and Computer Engineering, Carleton University, Oct. 31, 1983.
 
10
 
11

Collaborative Colleagues:
C. M. Woodside: colleagues
R. Montealegre: colleagues
R. J. A. Buhr: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: