ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Measurement of technology mediated communication style: the communication preferences inventory (CPI)
Full text PdfPdf (57 KB)
Source IBM Centre for Advanced Studies Conference archive
Proceedings of the 2002 conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative research table of contents
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Page: 8  
Year of Publication: 2002
Authors
Heather Parker  Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto
Mark Chignell  Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto
Leonardo Ruppenthal  Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto
Sponsors
IBM Canada : IBM Canada
NRC : National Research Council - Canada
Publisher
IBM Press 
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 44,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

This paper describes the development of a new inventory for measuring communication preferences (the CPI). It begins with a discussion of the need for such an inventory, along with a description of earlier work on use of unified communications technology that motivated its development. The current 62-item of the CPI is presented, along with the associated factor structure based on a sample of 110 respondents. The relationship of the CPI to the big five personality factors is discussed, and a study is reported that assesses the ability of CPI items to predict email and newsgroup behaviour.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
(1) Anastasi, A., and Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological Testing. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
 
2
(2) Ayersman, D. J., and von Minden, A. (1995). Individual differences, computers, and instruction. Computers in Human Behavior 11, no. 3-4 p.371-390.
 
3
(3) Chignell, M., and Ruppenthal, L. (1999). An Analysis of Telecommunication Preferences and Attitudes. Technical Report #IML-1999-01. Toronto: Interactive Media Lab, University of Toronto.
 
4
(4) Conoley, J. C., and Impara, J. C., eds. (1995). The Twelfth Mental Measurements Yearbook. Lincoln, NE: The Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
 
5
(5) Costa, P. T., and McCrae, R. R. Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences 13, no. 6 (1992): 653-665.
 
6
(6) Deacon, T. M. (1997) The Symbolic Species: The Co-Evolution of Language and the Human Brain. London: Penguins.
 
7
(7) DeYoung, C. G., and Spence, I. The Technology Profile Inventory: A self-report questionnaire for assessing attitudes toward information technology. Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the European Association for Psychological Assessment, Aachen, Germany, 2001.
 
8
 
9
(9) John, O. P., and Srivastava, S. The Big Five Trait Taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, edited by L. A. Pervin and O. P. John. New York: Guilford Press, (1999): 102-138.
10
 
11
(11) Leung, M.D. (2002). Web-based collaboration involving voice technology. Undergraduate Research Thesis, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto.
12
13
14
 
15
(15) Ruppenthal, L. and Chignell, M. (2002). Profiling Users of Unified Communication Service: Understanding Communication Traits and Styles. Technical Report #IML-2002-01. Interactive Media Lab, University of Toronto.
 
16
 
17
(17) Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communications Research 19, no. 1 p. 52-90.
 
18
(18) Witkin, H. A., Oltman, P. K., Raskin, E., and Karp, S .A. (1971). A Manual For The Embedded Figures Test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1971.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Heather Parker: colleagues
Mark Chignell: colleagues
Leonardo Ruppenthal: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: