|
ABSTRACT
We present an exploration of reading patterns and usability in visualizations of electronic documents. Twenty subjects wrote essays and answered questions about scientific documents using an overview+detail, a fisheye, and a linear interface. We study reading patterns by progression maps that visualize the progression of subjects' reading activity, and by visibility maps that show for how long different parts of the document are visible. The reading patterns help explain differences in usability between the interfaces and show how interfaces affect the way subjects read. With the overview+detail interface, subjects get higher grades for their essays. All but one of the subjects prefer this interface. With the fisheye interface, subjects use more time on gaining an overview of the document and less time on reading the details. Thus, they read the documents faster, but display lower incidental learning. We also show how subjects only briefly have visible the parts of the document that are not initially readable in the fisheye interface, even though they express a lack of trust in the algorithm underlying the fisheye interface. When answering questions, the overview is used for jumping directly to answers in the document and to already-visited parts of the document. However, subjects are slower at answering questions with the overview+detail interface. From the visualizations of the reading activity, we find that subjects using the overview+detail interface often explore the document further even when a satisfactory answer to the given question has already been read. Thus, overviews may grab subjects' attention and possibly distract them.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Anderson, T. H. and Armbruster, B. B. 1982. Reader and text-studying strategies. In Reading Expository Material. W. Otto and S. White, Eds. New York, NY: Academic Press. 219--242.
|
| |
2
|
Bazerman, C. 1988. Shaping Written Knowledge. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.
|
| |
3
|
Bishop, A. P. 1995. Working towards an understanding of digital library use. D-Lib Magazine, October 1995, http://www.dlib.org/dlib/october95/10bishop.html.
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
Boguraev, B., Kennedy, C., Bellamy, R., Brawer, S., and Wong, Y. Y. 1998. Dynamic presentation of document content for rapid on-line skimming. In AAAI Spring 1998 Symposium on Intelligent Text Summarization, E. Hovy and D. Radev, Eds., AAAI Press, Stanford CA, 109--118.
|
| |
6
|
|
 |
7
|
|
 |
8
|
Michael D. Byrne , Bonnie E. John , Neil S. Wehrle , David C. Crow, The tangled Web we wove: a taskonomy of WWW use, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: the CHI is the limit, p.544-551, May 15-20, 1999, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
[doi> 10.1145/302979.303154]
|
| |
9
|
Chen, C., and Rada, R. 1996. Interacting with hypertext: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 11, 2, 125--156.
|
| |
10
|
Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
|
| |
11
|
Dee-Lucas, D. and Larkin, J. H. 1995. Learning from electronic texts: Effects of interactive overviews for information access. Cogn. Instruct. 13, 3, 431--468.
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
|
 |
14
|
Dennis E. Egan , Joel R. Remde , Louis M. Gomez , Thomas K. Landauer , Jennifer Eberhardt , Carol C. Lochbaum, Formative design evaluation of superbook, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), v.7 n.1, p.30-57, Jan. 1989
[doi> 10.1145/64789.64790]
|
| |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
Foltz, P. W. 1996. Comprehension, coherence and strategies in hypertext and linear text. In Hypertext and Cognition. Rouet, J. F., Levonen, J. J., Dillon, Andrew P., and Spiro, R. J., Eds. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 109--136.
|
 |
17
|
|
 |
18
|
Adam Ginsburg , Joe Marks , Stuart Shieber, A viewer for PostScript documents, Proceedings of the 9th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, p.31-32, November 06-08, 1996, Seattle, Washington, United States
[doi> 10.1145/237091.237095]
|
| |
19
|
Goldman, S. R. and Saul, E. U. 1990. Flexibility in text processing. Learning and Individual Differences, 2, 2, 181--219.
|
 |
20
|
|
| |
21
|
Guthrie, J. 1998. Locating information in documents: examination of a cognitive model. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 178--199.
|
 |
22
|
|
 |
23
|
|
| |
24
|
Hertzum, M., Lalmas, M., and Frøkjær, E. 2001. How are searching and reading intertwined during retrieval from hierarchically structured documents? In Proceedings of the IFIP TC 13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Tokyo, Japan, Jul. 2001, M. Kurosu, Ed., IOS Press, Amsterdam, 537--544.
|
 |
25
|
|
 |
26
|
|
 |
27
|
Kasper Hornbæk , Erik Frøkjær, Reading of electronic documents: the usability of linear, fisheye, and overview+detail interfaces, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.293-300, March 2001, Seattle, Washington, United States
[doi> 10.1145/365024.365118]
|
| |
28
|
|
 |
29
|
|
 |
30
|
Julian Kupiec , Jan Pedersen , Francine Chen, A trainable document summarizer, Proceedings of the 18th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, p.68-73, July 09-13, 1995, Seattle, Washington, United States
[doi> 10.1145/215206.215333]
|
| |
31
|
Langer, E. J. 1991. Mindfulness. London: Harvill.
|
 |
32
|
|
 |
33
|
|
| |
34
|
Muter, P. 1996. Interface design and optimization of reading of continuous text. In Cognitive Aspects of Electronic Text Processing. H. van Oostendorp and S. de Mul, Eds. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
|
 |
35
|
|
| |
36
|
Páez, L. B., da Silva-Fh., J. B., and Marchionini, G. 1996. Disorientation in electronic environments: A study of hypertext and continuous zooming interfaces. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Baltimore, MD, Oct. 1996, Harding, S., Ed., 58--66.
|
| |
37
|
|
| |
38
|
Raskin, J. 2000. The Humane Interface. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.
|
 |
39
|
|
| |
40
|
Rosenthal, R., Rosnow, R. L., and Rubin, D. B. 2000. Contrasts and Effect Sizes in Behavioral Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
| |
41
|
Rothkopf, E. 1971. Incidental memory for location of information in text. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 10, 608--613.
|
| |
42
|
|
 |
43
|
|
| |
44
|
|
| |
45
|
Wright, P. 1987. Reading and writing for electronic journals. In Executive Control Processes in Reading. B. K. Britton and S. M. Glynn, Eds.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 23--55.
|
 |
46
|
Polle T. Zellweger , Susan Harkness Regli , Jock D. Mackinlay , Bay-Wei Chang, The impact of fluid documents on reading and browsing: an observational study, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.249-256, April 01-06, 2000, The Hague, The Netherlands
[doi> 10.1145/332040.332440]
|
CITED BY 12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alexander J. Quinn , Chang Hu , Takeshi Arisaka , Anne Rose , Benjamin B. Bederson, Readability of scanned books in digital libraries, Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 05-10, 2008, Florence, Italy
|
|
|
INDEX TERMS
Primary Classification:
H.
Information Systems
H.5
INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
H.5.2
User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
Subjects:
Evaluation/methodology
Additional Classification:
H.
Information Systems
H.5
INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
H.5.2
User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
Subjects:
Interaction styles (e.g., commands, menus, forms, direct manipulation)
I.
Computing Methodologies
I.3
COMPUTER GRAPHICS
I.3.6
Methodology and Techniques
Subjects:
Interaction techniques
General Terms:
Experimentation,
Human Factors,
Measurement,
Performance
Keywords:
Electronic documents,
digital documents,
fisheye interface,
information retrieval,
information visualization,
overview+detail interface,
reading,
reading patterns
REVIEW
"Evangelia Kavakli : Reviewer"
Nearest neighbor searches are important in many database and classification applications. Sequential searches are too expensive to perform and take too long for efficient interactive query activity. The data is usually multidimensional, and effici
more...
|