ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The multifrontal method and paging in sparse Cholesky factorization
Full text PdfPdf (1.20 MB)
Source ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS) archive
Volume 15 ,  Issue 4  (December 1989) table of contents
Pages: 310 - 325  
Year of Publication: 1989
ISSN:0098-3500
Author
Joseph W. H. Liu  York Univ. North York, Ont., Canada
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 38,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/76909.76911
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we show that the multifrontal method can have significant advantage over the conventional sparse column-Cholesky scheme on a paged virtual memory system. A more than tenfold reduction in paging activities can be achieved, which saves as much as 20 percent in factorization time. We also introduce a hybrid sparse factorization method, which uses a mixture of column-Cholesky and submatrix-Cholesky operations. By switching to the use of frontal matrices from column-Cholesky operations at appropriate columns, we demonstrate that the proposed hybrid scheme has an advantage over the sparse column-Cholesky method in reducing paging activities and over the multifrontal method in its adaptability to the amount of available working storage.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
ASHCRAFT, C. A vector implementation of the multifrontal method for large sparse, symmetric positive definite linear systems. Tech. Rep. ETA-TR-51, Engineering Technology Applications Division, Boeing Computer Services, Seattle, Wash., 1987.
 
2
DONGARRA, J. J., GUSTAVSON, F. G., AND KARP, A. Implementing linear algebra algorithms for dense matrices on a vector pipeline machine. SIAM Rev. 26 (1984), 91-112.
 
3
DUFF, I.S. Full matrix techniques in sparse Gaussian elimination. In Lecture Notes in Mathematics 912. G. A. Watson, Ed. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1982, pp. 71-84.
 
4
DUFF, I.S. The solution of sparse linear equations on the CRAY-1. CSS 125, Computer Sciences and Systems Division, AERE Harwell, Oxfordshire, England, 1983.
5
 
6
7
 
8
EISENSTAT, S. C., GURSKY, M. C., SCHULTZ, M. H., AND SHERMAN, A.H. The Yale sparse matrix package, I. The symmetric code. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 18 (1982), 1145-1151.
 
9
GENTLEMAN, W. M., AND GEORGE, J.A. Sparse matrix software. In Sparse Matrix Computat/ons, J. R. Bunch and D. J. Rose, Eds. Academic Press, Orlando, Fla., 1976, pp. 243-261.
 
10
 
11
GEORGE, J. A., HEATH, M., AND LIU, J. W.H. Parallel Cholesky factorization on a sharedmemory multiprocessor. Linear Algebra and Its Application 77 (1986), 165-187.
12
 
13
14
15
 
16
 
17
LIu, J. W.H. A collection of routines for an implementation of the multifrontal method. Tech. Rep. CS-87-10, Dept. of Computer Science, York University, North York, Ontario, Canada, 1987.
 
18
MUNKSGAARD, N. New factorization codes for sparse symmetric and positive definite matrices. BIT 19 (1979), 43-65.
 
19
REID, J. K. TREESOLVE, a Fortran package for solving large sets of linear finite element equations. CSS 155, Computer Sciences and Systems Division, AERE Harwell, Oxfordshire, England, 1984.
20
 
21



REVIEW


Assume that A is a large and sparse matrix. Assume further that A is symmetric and positive definite. Consider the solution of the system Ax more...


Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: