| A qualitative modelling environment for design & diagnosis of automation |
| Full text |
Pdf
(415 KB)
|
| Source
|
International conference on Industrial and engineering applications of artificial intelligence and expert systems
archive
Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Industrial and engineering applications of artificial intelligence and expert systems - Volume 1
table of contents
Tullahoma, Tennessee, United States
Pages: 192 - 196
Year of Publication: 1989
ISBN:0-89791-320-5
|
|
Authors
|
|
D. Pearce
|
The Turing Institute, Glasgow, Scotland
|
|
E. Grant
|
The Turing Institute, Glasgow, Scotland
|
|
| Sponsor |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 0, Downloads (12 Months): 5, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
This paper describes a qualitative modelling toolbox for designing and developing application independent architectures.Developed out of a remote monitoring application, the toolbox uses object-oriented software and encapsulates knowledge-based information from a human expert to construct the model. Being object-oriented there is full inheritance between individual objects. It was considered feasible that the original work could be the basis of a design tool for automation architectures.Currently, application specific, hierarchically ordered architectures for automation are a barrier to progress. The present monolithic layering of such architectures means fault detection and monitoring remain the domain of the human expert. Here, we can produce the qualitative model in the form of an interactive user interface that can be used in fault monitoring and diagnosis and report faults. This modular, evolvable approach to designing architectures should aid in the reduction of their complexity particularly at the design stage.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
The computer integration organisation- some business and technology issues for osi-map/top solution. In ENE'88, Baltimore, USA, 1988.
|
| |
2
|
Peter Clark and Tim Niblett. Induction in noisy domains. In I. Bratko and N. Lavrac, editors, Progress in Machine Learning (proceedings of the 2nd European Working Session on Learning), Sigma, Wilmslow, UK, 1987.
|
| |
3
|
G.Moore. Manufacturing automation protocol. mapping the factory of the future. Electronics and Power, April, 1986.
|
| |
4
|
R. S. Michalski and J. Larson. Incremental generation of VL1 hypotheses: the underlying methodology and the description of program A Q11. Technical Report ISG 83-5, The University of of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Computer Science, Urbana, 1983.
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
D. Pearce. The induction of fault diagnosis systems from qualitative models. In AAAI88 The Seventh National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Proceedings, pages 353-357, St. Paul Minnesota, 1988.
|
| |
7
|
J. Ross Quinlan. Learning efficient classification procedures and their application to chess endgames. In J. G. Carbonell, R. S. Michalski, and T. M. Mitchell, editors, Machine Learning, vol. 1, Palo Alto, Ca, Tioga, 1983.
|
| |
8
|
S.Tulip. Map- the icl way. Computer Manufacturing, Nov, 1987.
|
|