ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Dynamic routing on networks with fixed-size buffers
Full text PdfPdf (1.25 MB)
Source Symposium on Discrete Algorithms archive
Proceedings of the fourteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms table of contents
Baltimore, Maryland
SESSION: Session 11C table of contents
Pages: 771 - 780  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:0-89871-538-5
Authors
William Aiello  AT&T Labs-Research
Rafail Ostrovsky  Telcordia Technologies
Eyal Kushilevitz  Technion, Haifa, Israel
Adi Rosén  Technion, Haifa, Israel
Sponsors
: SIAM Activity Group on Discrete Mathematics
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics  Philadelphia, PA, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 24,   Citation Count: 9
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

The combination of the buffer size of routers deployed in the Internet and the Internet traffic itself leads routinely to routers dropping packets. Motivated by this, we initiate the rigorous study of dynamic store-and-forward routing on arbitrary networks in a model in which dropped packets must explicitly be taken into account. To avoid the uncertainties of traffic modeling, we consider arbitrary traffic on the network. We analyze and compare the effectiveness of several greedy, on-line, local-control protocols using a competitive analysis of the throughput. One goal of our approach is for the competitive results to continue to hold as a network grows without requiring the memory in the nodes to increase with the size of the network. Thus, in our model, we have link buffers of fixed size, B, which is independent of the size of the network, and B becomes a parameter of the model.Our results are in contrast to another adversarial traffic model known as Adversarial Queuing Theory (AQT), which studies the stability and growth rate of queues as a function of the network and traffic parameters. For example, in AQT the Furthest-To-Go (FTG) protocol is stable for all networks whereas Nearest-To-Go (NTG) can be unstable for some networks. Unlike AQT, in our setting NTG is preferable to FTG: we show that the NTG protocol is throughput-competitive on all networks whereas the FTG protocol has unbounded competitiveness whenever a network contains even small cycles.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
W. Aiello, Y. Mansour, S. Rajagopolan, A. Rosén, "Competitive Queue Policies for Differentiated Services," Proc. of 19th INFOCOM, pp. 431--440, 2000.
 
2
 
3
B. Awerbuch, Y. Azar, and S. Plotkin, "Throughput Competitive On-Line Routing," 34th FOCS, pp. 32--40, 1993.
 
4
B. Awerbuch, A. Brinkman, C. Scheideler, "Any-casting and Multicasting in Adversarial Systems: Routing and Admission Control," manuscript, http://www.cs.jhu.edu/~scheideler.
 
5
 
6
7
8
9
10
 
11
12
 
13
14
 
15
16
 
17
T. Leighton, B. Maggs, S. Rao, "Packet Routing and Job-Shop Scheduling in O(congestion+dilation) Steps," Combinatorica, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 167--180, 1994.
 
18
T. Leighton, B. Maggs and A. Richa, "Fast Algorithms for Finding O(Congestion+Dilation) Packet Routing Schedules," Combinatorica, to appear.
 
19
20
 
21
M. Mihail, "Conductance and Convergence of Markov Chains---A Combinatorial Treatment of Expanders," Proc. of 30th FOCS, pp. 526--531, 1989.
 
22
23
 
24
C. Partridge, The end of simple traffic models. IEEE Network, Vol. 7 No. 5, Editor note. 1993.
 
25
 
26
27
28
 
29
G. Stamoulis and J. Tsitsiklis, "The Efficiency of Greedy Routing in Hypercubes and Butterflies," IEEE Transactions on Communications, 42 (11), pp. 3051--208, 1994.
30
 
31
A. Veres, and M. Boda, The chaotic nature of TCP congestion control. In Proc. of INFOCOM 2000, 2000.

CITED BY  9
 
 

Collaborative Colleagues:
William Aiello: colleagues
Rafail Ostrovsky: colleagues
Eyal Kushilevitz: colleagues
Adi Rosén: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: