ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Faceted metadata for image search and browsing
Full text PdfPdf (823 KB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA
SESSION: Searching and organizing table of contents
Pages: 401 - 408  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-630-7
Authors
Ka-Ping Yee  University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
Kirsten Swearingen  University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
Kevin Li  University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
Marti Hearst  University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 38,   Downloads (12 Months): 438,   Citation Count: 91
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/642611.642681
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

There are currently two dominant interface types for searching and browsing large image collections: keyword-based search, and searching by overall similarity to sample images. We present an alternative based on enabling users to navigate along conceptual dimensions that describe the images. The interface makes use of hierarchical faceted metadata and dynamically generated query previews. A usability study, in which 32 art history students explored a collection of 35,000 fine arts images, compares this approach to a standard image search interface. Despite the unfamiliarity and power of the interface (attributes that often lead to rejection of new search interfaces), the study results show that 90% of the participants preferred the metadata approach overall, 97% said that it helped them learn more about the collection, 75% found it more flexible, and 72% found it easier to use than a standard baseline system. These results indicate that a category-based approach is a successful way to provide access to image collections.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
L. H. Armitage and P. G. B. Enser. Analysis of user need in image archives. Journal of Information Science, 23(4):287--299, 1997.
 
2
M. L. Bernard. Examining the effects of hypertext shape on user performance. Usability News, 4(2), 2002.
 
3
P. Borland and P. Ingwersen. The development of a method for the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. Journal of Documentation, 53(3):225--250, 1997.
 
4
 
5
 
6
C. Fellbaum, editor. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press, 1998.
7
8
9
 
10
11
 
12
W. Niblack, R. Barber, W. Equitz, M. Flickner, E. Glasman, D. Petkovic, P. Yanker, and C. Faloutsos. The QBIC project: Querying images by content using color, texture, and shape. SPIE: Storage and Retrieval for Image and Video Databases, 1908, 1993.
13
14
15
16
 
17
 
18
R. C. Veltkamp and M. Tanase. Content-Based Image Retrieval Systems: A Survey. Technical Report UU-CS-2000-34, Dept. of Computing Science, Utrecht University, 2000.

CITED BY  92
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Collaborative Colleagues:
Ka-Ping Yee: colleagues
Kirsten Swearingen: colleagues
Kevin Li: colleagues
Marti Hearst: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: