ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Path delay fault testing using test points
Full text PdfPdf (106 KB)
Source ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems (TODAES) archive
Volume 8 ,  Issue 1  (January 2003) table of contents
Pages: 1 - 10  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISSN:1084-4309
Authors
S. Tragoudas  Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL
N. Denny  University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 45,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/606603.606604
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Inserting controllable/observable points in the test architecture has been shown to be a viable method for reducing the number of path delay faults that need to be tested in a circuit. In order to have a minimal impact on the operation clock and more accuracy in testing, it is proposed that test points should be inserted with the additional constraint that every path has a bounded number of test points. A polynomial time solvable integer linear programming (ILP) formulation serves as the basis for the presented test placement methodology. Due to the ILP's global optimization property we achieve results that are comparable to those by an existing greedy technique for the less constrained test point placement problem.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
Leiserson, C. and Saxe, J. 1991. Retiming synchronous circuitry. Algorithmica 6, 5--35.
 
13
 
14
Malaiya, Y. K. and Narayanaswamy, R. 1983. Testing for timing faults in synchronous sequential integrated circuits. In Proceedings of the International Test Conference. 560--571.
 
15
Pomeranz, I. and Reddy, S. 1998. Design for testability for path delay faults in large combinational circuits using test points. IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integ. Circ. Syst. 17, 4 (Apr.), 333--343.
 
16
Pomeranz, I., Reddy, S. M., and Uppaluri, P. 1995. NEST: A nonenumerative test generation method for path delay faults in combinational circuits. IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integ. Circ. Syst. 14, 12 (Dec.), 1505--1515.
 
17
Reddy, S. M., Reddy, M. K., and Agrawal, V. D. 1984. Robust tests for stuck-open faults in CMOS combinational logic circuits. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Fault-Tolerant Computing. 44--49.
 
18
Schultz, M. H., Fuchs, K., and Fink, K. 1989. Advanced automatic test pattern generation techniques for path delay faults. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Fault-Tolerant Computing. 45---51.
 
19
 
20
Tragoudas, S. and Denny, N. 1999a. Path reduction with register repositioning. In Proceedings of the IEEE International High Level Design Validation and Test Workshop. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 42--45.
 
21
 
22
Tragoudas, S. and Karayiannis, D. 1999. A fast nonenumerative automatic test pattern generator for path delay faults. IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. of Integ. Circ. Syst. 18, 7 (July), 1050--1058.
 
23


REVIEW

"Festus Gail Gray : Reviewer"

An interesting theoretical problem is addressed in this paper: when inserting exactly one test point in each physical path in a circuit (thereby dividing each physical path into two segments, and partitioning the circuit into two disjoint pieces),  more...


Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: