ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Classical physics and the Church--Turing Thesis
Full text PdfPdf (41 KB)
Source Journal of the ACM (JACM) archive
Volume 50 ,  Issue 1  (January 2003) table of contents
Pages: 100 - 105  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISSN:0004-5411
Author
Andrew Chi-Chih Yao  Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 20,   Downloads (12 Months): 129,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/602382.602411
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Would physical laws permit the construction of computing machines that are capable of solving some problems much faster than the standard computational model? Recent evidence suggests that this might be the case in the quantum world. But the question is of great interest even in the realm of classical physics. In this article, we observe that there is fundamental tension between the Extended Church--Turing Thesis and the existence of numerous seemingly intractable computational problems arising from classical physics. Efforts to resolve this incompatibility could both advance our knowledge of the theory of computation, as well as serve the needs of scientific computing.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Church, A. 1936. An unsolvable problem of elementary number theory. Amer. J. Math. 21, 345--363.
 
3
Damour, T. 1990. The problem of motion in Newtonian and Einsteinian gravity. In Three Hundred Years of Gravitation, S. W. Hawking and W. Israel, Eds. Cambridge University Press, 128--198.
 
4
Diacu, F., and Holmes, P. 1996. Celestial Encounters: The Origins of Chaos & Stability. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
 
5
Feynman, R. P. 1982. Simulating physics with computers. Internat. J. Theor. Phys. 21, 467--488.
 
6
Gerver, J. 1991. The existence of pseudocollisions in the plane. J. Diff. Eq. 89, 1--68.
 
7
Misner, C. W., Thorne, K. S., and Wheeler, J. A. 1973. Gravitation. Freeman.
 
8
Painlevé, P. 1897. Lecons sur la théorie analytic des equations différentielles. Hermann, Paris, France.
 
9
Penrose, R. 1989. The Emperor's New Mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.
 
10
Penrose, R. 1994. Shadows of the Mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.
 
11
Saari, D. G. 1977. A global existence theorem for the four-body problem of Newtonian mechanics. J. Diff. Eq., 26, 80--111.
 
12
 
13
Smith, W. 1993. Church's thesis meets the N-body problem. Manuscript (http://www.neci.nec.com/homepages/wds/works.html).
 
14
Smith, W. 1999. Church's thesis meets quantum mechanics. Manuscript (http://www.neci.nec.com/homepages/wds/works.html).
 
15
Steiglitz, K. 1988. Two nonstandard paradigms for computation: Analog machines and cellular automata. In Performance Limits in Communication Theory and Practice, J. K. Skwirzynski, Ed. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 173--192. (NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series E, No. 142.)
 
16
 
17
Turing, A. M. 1936--1937. On comutable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem. Proc. London Math. Soc., Ser. 2, 42, 230--265.
 
18
Xia, Z. 1992. The existence of noncollision singularities in the n-body problem. Ann. Math. 135, 3, 411--468.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Andrew Chi-Chih Yao: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: