ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Little machines: understanding users understanding interfaces
Full text PdfPdf (184 KB)
Source ACM Journal of Computer Documentation (JCD) archive
Volume 25 ,  Issue 4  (November 2001) table of contents
COLUMN: New article table of contents
Pages: 119 - 127  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISSN:1527-6805
Author
Johndan Johnson-Eilola  Clarkson University, Potsdam, N.Y.
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 74,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/586569.586571
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper questions the ubiquitous practice of supplying minimalist information to users, of making that information functional only, of assuming that the Shannon-Weaver communication model should govern online systems, and of ignoring the social implications of such a stance. Help systems that provide fast, temporary solutions without providing any background information lead to the danger of users completing tasks that they do not understand at all. (Word will help us write a legal pleading, even if we have no idea what one is.) As a result, we have help systems that attempt to be invisible and to provide tool instruction but not conceptual instruction. Such a system presents itself as a neutral tool, but it is actually an incomplete environment, denying both the complexity and alternative (and possibly improved) modes of thinking about the subject at hand.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Connors, Robert J. (1982). The rise of technical writing instruction in America. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 12, 329-352.
 
2
Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia, (Brian Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P.
 
3
Dobrin, David N. (1983). What's technical about technical writing? In Paul V. Anderson, R. John Brockman, & Carolyn R. Miller (Eds.), New essays in technical and scientific communication: Vol. 2. Research, theory, practice (pp. 227-250). Farmingdale, NY: Baywood.
 
4
Eco, U. (1988). An Ars Oblivionalis? Forget it! PMLA 103, 254-261.
 
5
Haraway, Donna. (1985, March/April). A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s. Socialist Review 80, 65-105.
 
6
Hirschhorn, Larry. (1984). Beyond mechanization: Work and technology in a postindustrial age. Cambridge: MIT Press.
 
7
 
8
 
9
Selfe, Cynthia L. & Richard J. Selfe. (1994). The politics of the interface: Power and its exercise in electronic contact zones. College Composition and Communication 45, 480-504.
 
10
 
11
Virilio, Paul. (1986) Speed and politics: An essay on dromology (Mark Polizzotti, Trans.). New York: Semiotext(e).
 
12
Wigley, M. (1995). The architecture of deconstruction: Derrida's haunt. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
 
13
Wood, Denis. (1992). The power of maps. New York: Guilford.
 
14
Woolever, Kristin R. & Helen M. Loeb. (1994). Writing for the computer industry. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Johndan Johnson-Eilola: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: