ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Analysis of different approaches for storing GML documents
Full text PdfPdf (683 KB)
Source Geographic Information Systems archive
Proceedings of the 10th ACM international symposium on Advances in geographic information systems table of contents
McLean, Virginia, USA
SESSION: GIS and the internet table of contents
Pages: 11 - 16  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-591-2
Authors
J. E. Córcoles  Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Spain
P. González  Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Spain
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 60,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/585147.585151
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The fact that GML is an XML encoding allows it to be queried. In order to query a GML document we have designed a query language over GML/XML enriched with spatial operators. This query language has an underlying data model and algebra that supplies the semantics of the query language. In order to use this query language, it is necessary to find an implementation that allows us to exploit all its features, storing GML documents efficiently. The general aim of this paper is to study the behaviour of different alternatives over XML documents (alphanumeric data) applied to store and query GML documents (alphanumeric and spatial data). The alternatives selected use relational schemas to store GML documents because they use a complete set of data management services (including concurrency control, crash recovery, scalability, etc) and benefit from the highly optimised relational query processor. Three approaches have been used: LegoDB, a structure-mapping approach, and two simple model-mapping approaches, Monet over Relational database and XParent. We focus on the effectiveness of storage models in terms of query processing. A performance study is conducted using three data sets and the experimental results are given.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
OpenGis Consortium. Specifications. http://www.opengis.org/techno/specs.htm.1999
 
2
OpenGIS Consortium. Geography Markup Language (GML) v2.0. Document Number: 01-029. Http://www.opengis.net/gml/01-029/GML2.html. 2001.
 
3
J. Córcoles and P. González. A spatial query language over XML documents. Fifth IASTED International Conference on Software Engineering and Applications (SEA). pp.1--6. 2001.
4
5
6
 
7
 
8
G. Kappel, E. Kapsammer, S. Raush.Schott and W. Retschitzegger. X-ray - towards integrating xml and relational database systems. In proccedings of International Conference on Conceptual Modeling. 2000.
 
9
D. Lee and W. Chu. Contraints-preserving transformation from xml document type definition to relational schema. In proceeding of the International Conference on Conceptual Modeling, pp 323--338. 2000.
 
10
M. Klettke and H. Meyer. Managing XML documents in Object-Relational databases. Workshop on the Web and Databases (WebDB). 2000.
 
11
 
12
H. Jiang, H. Lu, W. Wang and J. Xu Yu. Path Materialization Revisted: An efficient Storage Model for XML Data. 2nd Austrlian Institute of Computer ethics Confrence (AICE2000). Canberra. Australia. 2002.
 
13
 
14
 
15
D. Florescu and D. Kossmann. Storing and Querying XML Data Using an RDBMS. Data Engineering Bulletin, 22(3), 1999.
 
16
S. Banerjee, V. Krishnamurthy, M.. Krishnaprasad and R. Murthy. Oracle8i - The XML Enabled Data Management System. In: IEEE ICDE. 2000.
 
17
Oracle9i Database Documentation. http://otn.oracle.com:80/docs/products/oracle9i/content.html. 2002.
 
18
J. M. Cheng, J. Xu, "XML and DB2". In: IEEE ICDE.2000.
 
19
Open GIS Consortium, Inc. OpenGIS: Simple Features Specification For SQL Revision 1.1 OpenGIS 99-049 Release. 1999.
 
20
 
21
U. Nambiar, Z. Lacroix, S. Bressan, M. Li Lee and Y. Li. XML Benchmarks put to the test. 3rd International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications and Services (IIWAS). 2001.
 
22
23
 
24
 
25


Collaborative Colleagues:
J. E. Córcoles: colleagues
P. González: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: