ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Rescaling reliability bounds for a new operational profile
Full text PdfPdf (279 KB)
Source International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis archive
Proceedings of the 2002 ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on Software testing and analysis table of contents
Roma, Italy
SESSION: Theory of testing and reability table of contents
Pages: 180 - 190  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN ~ ISSN:0163-5948 , 1-58113-562-9
Also published in ...
Author
Peter G Bishop  City University, Northampton Square, London, EC1V 0HB, UK
Sponsor
SIGSOFT: ACM Special Interest Group on Software Engineering
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 24,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/566172.566201
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

One of the main problems with reliability testing and prediction is that the result is specific to a particular operational profile. This paper extends an earlier reliability theory for computing a worst case reliability bound. The extended theory derives a re-scaled reliability bound based on the change in execution rates of the code segments in the program. In some cases it is possible to derive a maximum failure rate bound that applies to any change in the profile. It also predicts that (in principle) a "fair" test profile can be derived where the reliability bounds are relatively insensitive to the operational profile. In addition the theory allows unit and module test coverage measures to be incorporated into an operational reliability bound prediction. The implications of the theory are discussed, and the theory is evaluated by applying it to two example programs with known faults.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
P. G. Bishop, R. E. Bloomfield, "A Conservative Theory for Long-Term Reliability Growth Prediction", IEEE, Trans. Reliability, vol. 45, no. 4, pp 550-560, Dec. 1996 {3}
 
3
 
4
J. R. Gaffney, "Estimating the Number of Faults in Code", IEEE Trans. Software Engineering, vol. SE-10, no. 4, 1984
 
5
M. Kaaniche, K. Kanoun, M. Cukier and M. Bastos Martini, "Software Reliability Analysis of Three Successive Generation of a Switching System", LAAS, Report no 94.030, 1994.
 
6
 
7
 
8
A Pasquini, A N Crespo and P Matrella, "Sensitivity of reliability growth models to operational profile errors", IEEE Trans. Reliability, vol. 45, no. 4, pp 531-540, Dec. 1996
 
9


Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: