|
ABSTRACT
Originating from basic research conducted in the 1970's and 1980's, the parallel and distributed simulation field has matured over the last few decades. Today, operational systems have been fielded for applications such as military training, analysis of communication networks, and air traffic control systems, to mention a few. This tutorial gives an overview of technologies to distribute the execution of simulation programs over multiple computer systems. Particular emphasis is placed on synchronization (also called time management) algorithms as well as data distribution techniques.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
|
 |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
Chandy, K. M. and J. Misra (1978). "Distributed Simulation: A Case Study in Design and Verification of Distributed Programs." IEEE Transactions on Software EngineeringSE-5(5): 440-452.
|
 |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
Cohen, D. and A. Kemkes (1997). User-Level Measurement of DDM Scenarios. Proceedings of the Spring Simulation Interoperability Workshop.
|
 |
9
|
|
 |
10
|
Tapas K. Das , Gurminder Singh , Alex Mitchell , P. Senthil Kumar , Kevin McGee, NetEffect: a network architecture for large-scale multi-user virtual worlds, Proceedings of the ACM symposium on Virtual reality software and technology, p.157-163, September 1997, Lausanne, Switzerland
[doi> 10.1145/261135.261164]
|
| |
11
|
Ewa Deelman , Rajive Bagrodia , Rizos Sakellariou , Vikram Adve, Improving lookahead in parallel discrete event simulations of large-scale applications using compiler analysis, Proceedings of the fifteenth workshop on Parallel and distributed simulation, p.5-13, May 15-18, 2001, Lake Arrowhead, California, United States
|
| |
12
|
Dickens, P. M. and J. Reynolds, P. F. (1990). SRADS With Local Rollback. Proceedings of the SCS Multiconference on Distributed Simulation.22: 161-164.
|
| |
13
|
DIS Steering Committee (1994). The DIS Vision, A Map to the Future of Distributed Simulation. Orlando, Florida, Institute for Simulation and Training.
|
 |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
|
 |
17
|
|
| |
18
|
|
| |
19
|
Fujimoto, R. M., et al. (1995). "Parallel Simulation of Statistical Multiplexers." Journal of Discrete Event Dynamic Systems5: 115-140.
|
 |
20
|
|
| |
21
|
|
| |
22
|
IEEE Std 1278.1-1995 (1995). IEEE Standard for Distributed Interactive Simulation -- Application Protocols. New York, NY, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
|
 |
23
|
|
 |
24
|
|
| |
25
|
Bu-Sung Lee , Wentong Cai , Junlan Zhou, A causality based time management mechanism for federated simulation, Proceedings of the fifteenth workshop on Parallel and distributed simulation, p.83-90, May 15-18, 2001, Lake Arrowhead, California, United States
|
 |
26
|
|
 |
27
|
|
 |
28
|
Yi-Bing Lin , Bruno R. Preiss , Wayne M. Loucks , Edward D. Lazowska, Selecting the checkpoint interval in time warp simulation, Proceedings of the seventh workshop on Parallel and distributed simulation, p.3-10, May 16-19, 1993, San Diego, California, United States
|
| |
29
|
Miller, D. C. and J. A. Thorpe (1995). "SIMNET: The Advent of Simulator Networking." Proceedings of the IEEE83(8): 1114-1123.
|
 |
30
|
|
 |
31
|
|
 |
32
|
|
| |
33
|
Rak, S. J. and D. J. Van Hook (1996). Evaluation of Grid-Based Relevance Filtering for Multicast Group Assignment. Proceedins of the 14th DIS Workshop on Standards for the Interoperability of Distributed Simulations. Orlando, FL.
|
| |
34
|
Dhananjai Madhava Rao , Narayanan V. Thondugulam , Radharamanan Radhakrishnan , Philip A. Wilsey, Unsynchronized parallel discrete event simulation, Proceedings of the 30th conference on Winter simulation, p.1563-1570, December 13-16, 1998, Washington, D.C., United States
|
| |
35
|
Singhal, S. K. and D. R. Cheriton (1995). "Exploiting Position History for Efficient Remote Rendering in Networked Virtual Reality." Presence4(2): 169-193.
|
| |
36
|
Sokol, L. M. and B. K. Stucky (1990). MTW: Experimental Results for a Constrained Optimistic Scheduling Paradigm. Proceedings of the SCS Multiconference on Distributed Simulation.22: 169-173.
|
| |
37
|
Gary Tan , Liang Xu , Farshad Moradi , Simon Taylor, An agent-based DDM for high level architecture, Proceedings of the fifteenth workshop on Parallel and distributed simulation, p.75-82, May 15-18, 2001, Lake Arrowhead, California, United States
|
| |
38
|
|
Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read:
-
Data structures for quadtree approximation and compression
Communications of the ACM
28, 9
Hanan Samet
-
A hierarchical single-key-lock access control using the Chinese remainder theorem
Proceedings of the 1992 ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied computing
Kim S. Lee
, Huizhu Lu
, D. D. Fisher
-
An intelligent component database for behavioral synthesis
Proceedings of the 27th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference on
Gwo-Dong Chen
, Daniel D. Gajski
-
The GemStone object database management system
Communications of the ACM
34, 10
Paul Butterworth
, Allen Otis
, Jacob Stein
-
Putting innovation to work: adoption strategies for multimedia communication systems
Communications of the ACM
34, 12
Ellen Francik
, Susan Ehrlich Rudman
, Donna Cooper
, Stephen Levine
|