ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Output interpretation: some myths and common errors in simulation experiments
Full text PdfPdf (123 KB)
Source Winter Simulation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 33nd conference on Winter simulation table of contents
Arlington, Virginia
TUTORIAL SESSION: Introductory tutorials table of contents
Pages: 39 - 46  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:0-7803-7309-X
Author
Bruce W. Schmeiser  Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Sponsors
INFORMS/CS : Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences/College on Simulation
IEEE/SMCS : Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers/Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society
NIST : National Institute of Standards and Technology
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SCS : The Society for Computer Simulation International
SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
IIE : Institute of Industrial Engineers
IEEE/CS : Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers/Computer Society
ASA : American Statistical Association
Publisher
IEEE Computer Society  Washington, DC, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 18,   Citation Count: 7
Additional Information:

abstract   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

During the more than fifty years that Monte Carlo simulation experiments have been performed on digital computers, a wide variety of myths and common errors have evolved. We discuss some of them, with a focus on probabilistic and statistical issues.


CITED BY  7
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: