ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A profile of today`s computer literacy student
Full text PdfPdf (702 KB)
Source Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education archive
Proceedings of the seventeenth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education table of contents
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Pages: 27 - 33  
Year of Publication: 1986
ISBN:0-89791-178-4
Also published in ...
Authors
Jean Buddington Martin  Jacksonville Univ., Jacksonville, FL
Kenneth E. Martin  The Univ. of North Florida, Jacksonville
Sponsor
SIGCSE: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 8,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   cited by   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/5600.5608
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

What are the opinions and biases of students entering this course today? What do these students think they know, what do they think they should be learning? Have their opinions been altered by the technological and software trends? Do younger and older students have similar or markedly differing views and computer experiences. Can the needs of the students be met by such courses, or are the students actually more technologically literate than we believe? Noting the changes that have taken place over the last three or four years in the literacy course, the authors prepared a survey that was completed by all the students in two universities (317 students) during the first class of the fall 1985 semester. The results of that survey are the basis of this paper.




REVIEW

"Diane Walz : Reviewer"

This paper reports the results of a survey of 317 students entering computer literacy classes at two universities. Students were asked to report their levels of computer experience and to answer questions about their attitudes and expectations f  more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
Jean Buddington Martin: colleagues
Kenneth E. Martin: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: