ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Simple, state-based approaches to program-based anomaly detection
Full text PdfPdf (460 KB)
Source ACM Transactions on Information and System Security (TISSEC) archive
Volume 5 ,  Issue 3  (August 2002) table of contents
Pages: 203 - 237  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISSN:1094-9224
Authors
C. C. Michael  Cigital Labs, Dulles, VA
Anup Ghosh  Cigital Labs, Dulles, VA
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 17,   Downloads (12 Months): 141,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/545186.545187
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This article describes variants of two state-based intrusion detection algorithms from Michael and Ghosh [2000] and Ghosh et al. [2000], and gives experimental results on their performance. The algorithms detect anomalies in execution audit data. One is a simply constructed finite-state machine, and the other two monitor statistical deviations from normal program behavior. The performance of these algorithms is evaluated as a function of the amount of available training data, and they are compared to the well-known intrusion detection technique of looking for novel n-grams in computer audit data.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Anderson, J. 1980. Computer security threat monitoring and surveillance. Tech. Rep. James P. Anderson Co., Fort Washington, Pa.
 
2
 
3
Cannady, J. 1998. Artificial neural networks for misuse detection. In Proceedings of the 1998 National Information Systems Security Conference (NISSC'98). (Arlington, Va.), 443--456.
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
Grimmet, G. R. and Stirzaker, R. D. 1992. Probability and Random Processes. Oxford University Press.
12
13
 
14
 
15
Lai, T. L. 1998. Information bounds and quick detection of parameter changes in stochastic systems. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 44, 7, 2917--2929.
 
16
Lane, T. and Brodley, C. 1997. An application of machine learning to anomaly detection. In Proceedings of the 20th National Information Systems Security Conference. 366--377.
17
 
18
 
19
Lee, W., Stolfo, S., and Chan, P. 1997. Learning patterns from Unix process execution traces for intrusion detection. In Proceedings of AAAI97 Workshop on AI Methods in Fraud and Risk Management.
 
20
Lunt, T. 1990. Ides: an intelligent system for detecting intruders. In Proceedings of the Symposium: Computer Security, Threat and Countermeasures (Rome, Italy).
 
21
 
22
Lunt, T. and Jagannathan, R. 1988. A prototype real-time intrusion-detection system. In Proceedings of the 1988 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, Calif.
 
23
Lunt, T., Tamaru, A., Gilham, F., Jagannthan, R., Jalali, C., Javitz, H., Valdos, A., Neumann, P., and Garvey, T. 1992. A real-time intrusion-detection expert system (ides). Tech. Rep. Computer Science Laboratory, SRI Internationnal.
 
24
 
25
Porras, P. and Neumann, P. 1997. Emerald: Event monitoring enabling responses to anomalous live disturbances. In Proceedings of the 20th National Information Systems Security Conference. 353--365.
 
26
 
27
 
28
Staniford-Chen, S., Cheung, S., Crawford, R., Dilger, M., Frank, J., Hoagland, J., Levitt, K., Wee, C., Yip, R., and Zerkle, D. 1996. GrIDS---A graph based intrusion detection system for large networks. In Proceedings of the 19th National Information Systems Security Conference.
 
29
 
30
Warrender, C., Forrest, S., and Pearlmutter, B. 1999. Detecting intrusions using system calls: Alternative data models. In Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, Calif., 133--145.


Collaborative Colleagues:
C. C. Michael: colleagues
Anup Ghosh: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: