Gender, software design, and occupational equity

ABSTRACT

After reviewing the work on gender bias in software design, a model of gender-role influenced achievement choice taken from Eccles [7] is presented. The paper concludes that (1) though laudable, reduction of gender bias in software design is not the most straightforward way to reduce gender inequity in the choice of computing as a career, (2) the model itself makes more clear some of the ethical issues involved in attempting to achieve gender equity on computing, and (3) efforts to reduce gender inequity in the choice of computing as a career need to be evaluated in the light of this model.

REFERENCES

• 1: Anderman, E. M.; Eccles, J. S.; Yoon, K. S.; Roeser, R.; Wigfield, A; Blumenfeld, P. (2001). Learning to value mathematics and reading: Relations to mastery and performance-oriented instructional practices. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 26, 76-95.
• 2: Baumeister, R. F. (1984). Choking under pressure: Self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 610-620.
• 3: Baumeister, R. F., Hamilton, J., & Tice, D. (1985). Public versus private expectancy of success: Confidence booster or performance pressure? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1447-1457.
• 4: Beato, G. (1997). Girl Games. Wired. Retrieved December 27, 2001 from: http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/5.04/es_girlgames.html
• 5: Cooper, J., & Hall, J. (in press). Gender, experience, and attributions to the computer. Journal of Educational Computing Research.
• 6: Cooper, J., Hall, J., & Huff, C. W. (1990). Situational Stress as a consequence of sex stereotyped software. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 419-429.
• 7: Eccles, J. S. (1994). Understanding women's educational and occupational choices: applying the Eccles et al. Model of achievement related choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 585-609.
• 8: Cecilia M. Gorriz , Claudia Medina, Engaging girls with computers through software games, Communications of the ACM, v.43 n.1, p.42-49, Jan. 2000 [doi>10.1145/323830.323843]
• 9: Huff, C., & Cooper, J. (1987). Sex bias in educational software: The effect of designers' stereotypes on the software they design. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 519-532.
• 10: Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender difference in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 139-155.
• 11: Deborah G. Johnson , Keith W. Miller, Is diversity in computing a moral matter?, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.34 n.2, June 2002 [doi>10.1145/543812.543814]
• 12: Thomas K. Landauer, The trouble with computers, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995
• 13: Robinson-Staveley, K., & Cooper, J. (1990). Mere presence, gender, and reactions to computers: Studying human-computer interaction in the social context. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 168-183.
• 14: Single, P. B. and Muller, C. B. (2001). When email and mentoring unite: The implementation of a nationwide electronic mentoring program. In L. Stromei (Ed.), Implementing successful coaching and mentoring programs (pp. 107-122). Cambridge, MA: American Society for Training & Development (ASTD) In Action Series.
• 15: Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology. Special Issue: Motivation and the Educational Process, 25, 68-81.
• 16: Word, C. O., Zanna, M. P., & Cooper, J. (1973). The nonverbal mediation of self-fulfilling prophecies in interracial interaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 109-120.