ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Algorithmic derandomization via complexity theory
Full text PdfPdf (192 KB)
Source Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the thiry-fourth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
SESSION: Session 10A table of contents
Pages: 619 - 626  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-495-9
Author
D. Sivakumar  IBM Almaden Research Center, San Jose, CA
Sponsor
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 75,   Citation Count: 9
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/509907.509996
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We point out how the methods of Nisan [31, 32], originally developed for derandomizing space-bounded computations, may be applied to obtain polynomial-time and NC derandomizations of several probabilistic algorithms. Our list includes the randomized rounding steps of linear and semi-definite programming relaxations of optimization problems, parallel derandomization of discrepancy-type problems, and the Johnson--Lindenstrauss lemma, to name a few.A fascinating aspect of this style of derandomization is the fact that we often carry out the derandomizations directly from the statements about the correctness of probabilistic algorithms, rather than carefully mimicking their proofs.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
 
3
N. Alon and J. Spencer. The Probabilistic Method. Wiley, 1992. With an appendix by P. Erdós.
4
 
5
B. Berger and J. Rompel. Simulating (logcn)-wise independence in NC. In Proc. 30th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 2--7, 1989.
 
6
 
7
S. Dasgupta and A. Gupta. An elementary proof of the Johnson--Lindenstrauss lemma. Technical Report 99-006, University of California, Berkeley, 1999.
 
8
 
9
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
14
 
15
W. Johnson and J. Lindenstrauss. Extensions of Lipschitz mappings into a Hilbert space. In Conference in modern analysis and probability, pages 189--206. American (MATH)ematical Society, 1984.
 
16
D. Karger and D. Koller. (De)randomized construction of small sample spaces in NC. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 252--263, 1994.
17
 
18
19
 
20
21
 
22
N. Linial, E. London, and Y. Rabinovich. The geometry of graphs and some of its algorithmic applications. In Proc. 35th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 577--591, 1994. Journal version in Combinatorica, 15(2):215--245, 1995.
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
R. Motwani, J. Naor, and P. Raghavan. Randomization in approximation algorithms. In D. Hochbaum, editor, Approximation Algorithms. PWS Publishers, 1995.
 
28
 
29
30
31
32
 
33
N. Nisan, E. Szemerédi, and A. Wigderson. Undirected connectivity in O(log1.5 n) space. In Proc. 33rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 24--29, 1992.
 
34
 
35
 
36
 
37
38
39
 
40
41
42

CITED BY  9
 
 
 
 


Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: