ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Strategies for personal process improvement a comparison
Full text PdfPdf (558 KB)
Source Symposium on Applied Computing archive
Proceedings of the 2002 ACM symposium on Applied computing table of contents
Madrid, Spain
SESSION: Software engineering: theory, application and practice table of contents
Pages: 1036 - 1040  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-445-2
Authors
Rory O'Connor  Dublin City University, Ireland
Gerry Coleman  Dundalk Institute of Technology, Ireland
Sponsor
SIGAPP: ACM Special Interest Group on Applied Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 40,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/508791.508992
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Every so often, a new methodology is launched onto the software engineering landscape with all the force of a religious crusade. From its humble beginnings Software Process Improvement (SPI) has spread its wings into virtually every sector of the software engineering community and in the process has transformed itself from a bag of tools and techniques, into a serious set of methodologies for enhancing organisational effectiveness and competitive success. In the latter half of the 1990's, individual SPI methodologies such as PSP [1] and PIPSI [2] were promulgated as approaches to make the individual a better software engineer.Surveys of European software organisations [3] have shown support for SPI. In Europe to date, SPI programmes have concentrated at the organisational level, with less adoption at the level of the individual. This paper explores the role of individual-level methodologies in a European context and details the results of a series of experiments conducted by the authors.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
IPSSI Project, available at http://www.compapp.dcu.ie/ipssi
 
3
"The SPIRE Handbook", Centre for Software Engineering, Ireland, 1998.
 
4
 
5
 
6
W. Hayes and J. Over, "An Empirical Study of the Impact of the PSP on Individual Engineers", Technical Report SEI-97-001, Software Engineering Institute, December 1997.
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
P. O'Beirne and J. Sanders, "Personal Software Process: Does the PSP Deliver its promise?", Proceedings of Inspire '97, Gothenburg, Sweden, 1997.
11
12
 
13
G. Coleman and R. O'Connor. "Power to the Programmer - Using measurement to optimise the software process at the individual level", Proceedings of 11th European Software Control and Metrics conference, Munich, , April 2000.
 
14
R. O'Connor, et al., "A Tool to Support the Capture of Individual Process Data", Proceedings of EuroSPI, Denmark, November 2000.
 
15
"Improving Professional Software Skills in Industry - A Training Experiment", R. O'Connor, H. Duncan, G. Coleman, M. Morisio, C. McGowan, C. Mercier & Y. Wang, Technical Report CA-0201, Dublin City University, 2001.
 
16
 
17
"Does Europe have the right attitude to process improvement?", C. Chappell, Software in Focus, Issue 14, October 2000.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Rory O'Connor: colleagues
Gerry Coleman: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: