ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Secure multi-party computation problems and their applications: a review and open problems
Full text PdfPdf (909 KB)
Source New Security Paradigms Workshop archive
Proceedings of the 2001 workshop on New security paradigms table of contents
Cloudcroft, New Mexico
SESSION: Session 1: creative mathematics table of contents
Pages: 13 - 22  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-457-6
Authors
Wenliang Du  Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY
Mikhail J. Atallah  Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Sponsor
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 18,   Downloads (12 Months): 96,   Citation Count: 24
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/508171.508174
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The growth of the Internet has triggered tremendous opportunities for cooperative computation, where people are jointly conducting computation tasks based on the private inputs they each supplies. These computations could occur between mutually untrusted parties, or even between competitors. For example, customers might send to a remote database queries that contain private information; two competing financial organizations might jointly invest in a project that must satisfy both organizations' private and valuable constraints, and so on. Today, to conduct such computations, one entity must usually know the inputs from all the participants; however if nobody can be trusted enough to know all the inputs, privacy will become a primary concern.This problem is referred to as Secure Multi-party Computation Problem (SMC) in the literature. Research in the SMC area has been focusing on only a limited set of specific SMC problems, while privacy concerned cooperative computations call for SMC studies in a variety of computation domains. Before we can study the problems, we need to identify and define the specific SMC problems for those computation domains. We have developed a framework to facilitate this problem-discovery task. Based on our framework, we have identified and defined a number of new SMC problems for a spectrum of computation domains. Those problems include privacy-preserving database query, privacy-preserving scientific computations, privacy-preserving intrusion detection, privacy-preserving statistical analysis, privacy-preserving geometric computations, and privacy-preserving data mining.The goal of this paper is not only to present our results, but also to serve as a guideline so other people can identify useful SMC problems in their own computation domains.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
H. Kargupta, B. Park, D. Hershberger and, E. Johnson. Collective data mining: A new perspective toward distributed data mining. Advances in Distributed and Parallel Knowledge Discovery, 1999.
 
3
 
4
 
5
6
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
Wenliang Du and Mikhail J. Atallah. Protocols for secure remote database access with approximate matching. In 7th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (ACMCCS 2000), The First Workshop on Security and Privacy in E-Commerce, Athens, Greece, November 2000.
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
P. Gemmell. An introduction to threshold cryptography. In CryptoBytes, volume 2. RSA Laboratories, 1997.
 
16
O. Goldreich. Secure multi-party computation (working draft). Available from http://www.wisdom.weizmann.ac.il/home/oded/public_html/foc.html, 1998.
17
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
M. S. Goodstadt and V. Gruson. The randomized response technique: A test on drug use. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70(352):814-818, December 1975.
 
22
23
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
28
 
29
 
30
C. Cachin, S. Micali and M. Stadler. Computationally private information retrieval with polylogarithmic communication. Advances in Cryptology: EUROCRYPT '99, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1592:402-414, 1999.
31
32
 
33
K. H. Pollock and Y. Bek. A comparison of three randomized response models for quantitative data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356):994-886, December 1976.
 
34
M. Rabin. How to exchange secrets by oblivious transfer. Technical Report Tech. Memo TR-81, Aiken Computation Laboratory, 1981.
 
35
36
 
37
S. L. Warner. Randomized response: A surey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 60(309):63-69, March 1965.
 
38
S. L. Warner. Randomized response: A surey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66(336):884-888, December 1971.
 
39
A. C. Yao. Protocols for secure computations. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 1982.

CITED BY  24
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Collaborative Colleagues:
Wenliang Du: colleagues
Mikhail J. Atallah: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: