Visual attention to repeated internet images: testing the scanpath theory on the world wide web

ABSTRACT

The somewhat controversial and often-discussed theory of visual perception, that of scanpaths, was tested using Web pages as visual stimuli. In 1971, Noton and Stark defined "scanpaths" as repetitive sequences of fixations and saccades that occur upon re-exposure to a visual stimulus, facilitating recognition of that stimulus. Since Internet users are repeatedly exposed to certain visual displays of information, the Web is an ideal stimulus to test this theory. Eye-movement measures were recorded while subjects repeatedly viewed three different kinds of Internet pages -- a portal page, an advertising page and a news story page -- over the course of a week. Scanpaths were compared by using the string-edit methodology that measures resemblance between sequences. Findings show that on the World Wide Web, with somewhat complex visual digital images, some viewers' eye movements may follow a habitually preferred path -- a scanpath -- across the visual display. In addition, strong similarity among eye-path sequences of different viewers may indicate that other forces such as features of the Web site or memory are important.

REFERENCES

• 1: ABBOTT, A. 1995. A Primer on Sequence Methods. In Longitudinal Field Research Methods: Studying Processes and Longitudinal Change, Huber, G. P. and Van De Ven, A. (eds.), 204-227.
• 2: ABBOTT, A. and FORREST, J. 1986. Optimal Matching Sequences for Historical Sequences, Journal of Interdisciplinary History 16, 471-494.
• 3: ABBOTT, A. and HRYCAK, A. 1990. Measuring Resemblance in Sequence Data, American Journal of Sociology 16, 144-185.
• 4: ANTES, J. R. 1974. The Time Course of Picture Viewing, Journal of Experimental Psychology 103, 62-70.
• 5: BARON, L. 1980. Interaction Between Television and Child-related Characteristics as Demonstrated by Eye Movement Research, Education, Communication and Technology: A Journal of Theory, Research and Development 28, 4, 267-281.
• 6: BORGATTI, E. F., EVERETT, M. and FREEMAN, L. C. 1992. UCINET IV (Version 1.0) {Computer software}. Columbia: Analytic Technologies.
• 7: BRANDT, H. F. 1940. Ocular Patterns and Their Psychological Implications, American Journal of Psychology 53, 260-268.
• 8: BRANDT, S. A. and STARK, L. W. 1997. Spontaneous Eye Movements During Visual Imagery Reflect the Content of the Visual Scene, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 9, 1, 27-38.
• 9: BUSWELL, G. T. 1935. How People Look at Pictures. University of Chicago Press.
• 10: ELLIS, S. R. and SMITH, J. D. 1985. Patterns of Statistical Dependency in Visual Scanning. In Eye Movements and Human Information Processing, Rudolf Groner et al., (eds.), Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers BV, 221-238.
• 11: ELLIS, S. R. and STARK, L. 1978. Eye Movements During the Viewing of Necker Cubes, Perception 7, 575-581.
• 12: FISCHER, P. M., RICHARDS, J. W., BERMAN, E. F., and KRUGMAN, D. M. 1989. Recall and Eye Tracking Study of Adolescents Viewing Tobacco Ads, Journal of the American Medical Association 261, 1, 90-94.
• 13: GOULD, J. D. 1976. Looking at Pictures. In Eye Movements and Psychological Processes, Monty, R. A. and Senders, J. W. (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 323-345.
• 14: HOLMES, M. E. 1996. WinPhaser User's Manual: Version (Version 1.0c) {computer software}.
• 15: HOLMES, M. E. 1997. Optimal Matching Analysis of Negotiation Phase Sequences in Simulated and Authentic Hostage Negotiations, Communication Reports 10, 1, 1-8.
• 16: LLEWELLYN-THOMAS, E. 1968. Movements of the Eye, Scientific American 219, 88-95.
• 17: LOFTUS, G. R. 1976. A Framework for a Theory of Picture Recognition. In Eye Movements and Psychological Processes, Monty, R. A. and Senders, J. W. (eds.), John Wiley and Sons.
• 18: MACKWORTH, N. H. and MORANDI, A. J. 1967. The Gaze Selects Informative Details Within Pictures, Perception & Psychophysics 7, 173-178.
• 19: MACKWORTH, N. H. 1976. Stimulus Density Limits the Useful Field of View. In Eye Movements and Psychological Processes, Monty, R. A. and Senders, J. W. (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 307-321.
• 20: NOTON, D. and STARK, L. W. 1971a. Scanpaths in Saccadic Eye Movements While Viewing and Recognizing Patterns, Vision Research 11, 929-942.
• 21: NOTON, D. and STARK. L. W. 1971b. Scanpaths in Eye Movements During Pattern Perception, Science 171, 308-311.
• 22: PARKER, R. E. 1978. Picture Processing During Recognition, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 4, 284-292.
• 23: PIETERS, R., ROSBERGEN, E. and WEDEL, M. 1999. Visual Attention to Repeated Print Advertising: A Test of Scanpath Theory, Journal of Advertising Research 36, 424-438.
• 24: RAYNER, K. 1995. Eye Movements and Cognitive Processes in Reading, Visual Search, and Scene Perception. In Eye Movement Research: Mechanisms, Processes and Applications, Findlay, J. M. et al., (eds.), Addison-Wesley. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers BV, 3-22.
• 25: SALVUCCI, D. D. and ANDERSON, J. R. 2001. Automated Eye-Movement Protocol Analysis, Human-Computer Interaction 16, 1, 39-86.
• 26: SANKOFF, D. and KRUSKAL, J .B. (eds.) 1983. Time Warps, String Edits, and Macromolecules: The Theory and Practice of Sequence Comparison, Addison-Wesley Pub.
• 27: SPACHE, G. D. 1962. Is This a Breakthrough? The Reading Teacher 15, 258-263.
• 28: STARK, L. W. 1994. Sequences of Fixations and Saccades in Reading. In Eye Movements in Reading, Ygge, J. and Lennerstrand, G. (eds.), Elsevier Science Inc., 151-163.
• 29: STARK, L. W. and ELLIS, S. R. 1981. Scanpaths Revisited: Cognitive Models Direct Active Looking. In Eye Movements: Cognition and Visual Perception, Fisher, D. F. et al., (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 193-226.
• 30: YARBUS, A. L. 1967. Eye Movements and Vision. Plenum Press.

INDEX TERMS

Keywords:
Eye movement, Internet imagery, World Wide Web, eye tracking, optimal matching analysis, scanpath, sequence comparison, string editing