ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
An open architecture for secure interworking services
Full text PdfPdf (798 KB)
Source ACM SIGOPS European Workshop archive
Proceedings of the 7th workshop on ACM SIGOPS European workshop: Systems support for worldwide applications table of contents
Connemara, Ireland
SESSION: Position papers table of contents
Pages: 233 - 240  
Year of Publication: 1996
Authors
Richard Hayton  University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory, Cambridge CB2 3QG, United Kingdom
Ken Moody  University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory, Cambridge CB2 3QG, United Kingdom
Sponsors
SIGOPS: ACM Special Interest Group on Operating Systems
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 0,   Downloads (12 Months): 9,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/504450.504491
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

There is a developing need for applications and distributed services to cooperate or inter-operate. Current mechanisms can hide the heterogeneity of host operating systems and abstract the issues of distribution and object location. However, in order for systems to inter-operate securelythere must also be ways to hide differences in security policies, or at least to support negotiation between them.Other proposals for the interworking of security mechanisms have focussed on the enforcement of access policy at the expense of flexibility of expression of policy. This work describes a new architectural approach to security. The key idea is that a processis the universal client entity; a process may act on behalf of an identified individual as in traditional security schemes. More generally, a process may adopt an application-specific name or role, and this is used as the basis for authentication in Oasis. A service may then be written in terms of service-specific categories of clients, decoupled from the mechanisms used to specify and enforce access control policy.This approach allows great flexibility when integrating a number of services, and reduces the mismatch of policies that is common in heterogeneous systems. In addition, Oasis services may be integrated with alternative authentication and access control schemes, providing a truly open architecture.A flexible security definition is meaningless if not backed by a robust and efficient implementation. Oasis has been fully implemented, and is inherently distributed and scalable. In this paper we describe the general approach then concentrate on revocation, where security designs are most often criticised. Oasis is unique in supporting the rapid and selective revocation of privileges which can cascade between services and organisations.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Morris Sloman, Policy Driven Management for Distributed Systems, In Journal of Network and Systems Management, Plenum Press, 2(4) 1994
 
2
R. Hayton, OASIS, An Open Architecture for Secure Interworking Services, University of Cambridge PhD thesis, Technical Report 399. 1996.
3
 
4
Li Gong. A secure identity-based capability system. In Proceedings of the 1989 Symposium on Security and Privacy, pages 56-63. IEEE, May 1989.
5

Collaborative Colleagues:
Richard Hayton: colleagues
Ken Moody: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: